期刊文献+

中美大学生电子邮件文本对比研究 被引量:4

A Contrastive Analysis of Chinese and American Students' Emails
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于前人的研究 ,在已知中美大学生的背景和写作要求的前提下 ,本文对 36封英文电子邮件文本从词汇、句法、篇章和写作内容方面进行了对比分析。结果显示 :中国大学生用词略显呆板 ,缺乏时代感 ,而且反映日常生活的词汇量不够 ;从句法上看 ,美方学生比中方学生更多地使用了复合句和并列复合句 ,但两国学生的信件都采用了以单、复句为主 ,并列句和并列复合句为辅的结构 ;在语篇分析中 ,笔者发现中美大学生篇章长短的差异不存在绝对性 ;另外 ,中国大学生的英文邮件存在着受母语影响的修辞迁移迹象 ; Through contrastive analysis of 36 emails, this paper studies writing differences between Chinese and American college students in four aspects of lexicon, syntax, text and content respectively. The results show that Chinese students' lexical repertoire of daily life is deficient and somehow out of modern time while American students use complex sentences and compound-complex sentences more frequently than Chinese students do. Both Chinese and American Students predominantly apply simple and complex sentences in their writing only with compound and compound-complex sentences as subordinate structures. In textual analysis, it is found that the text length difference between Chinese and American students varies with topics in email communication, and that Chinese students tend to transfer Chinese rhetorical structures in English writings. Finally, the content contrast reveals different thinking models between Chinese and American college students in email texts.
出处 《西安外国语学院学报》 2004年第4期26-29,共4页 Journal of Xi'an Foreign Languages University
关键词 中国 美国 大学生 英语写作 电子邮件 思维模式 Chinese and American students emails contrastive analysis difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1[1]Brown, H. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching(2nd ed)[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents, 1987.
  • 2[2]Egbert,J.& L.Jessup.Analytic and systemic analysis of compu-ter-supported language learning environment[J]. TESLEJ, 1996(2).
  • 3[3]Krashen, S. & Terrell, T. The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom[M]. Hayward, CA: The Alemany Press, 1983.
  • 4[4]Lozanov, G. Suggestology and Outlines of Suggestopedy[M]. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1978.
  • 5[5]Reid, J. M. Teaching ESL Writing[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents, 1993.
  • 6陈莹.网络在英语教学中的应用[J].外语电化教学,2001(3):14-17. 被引量:31
  • 7顾佩娅,苏晓军.E-mail与英语教学:理论与应用[J].外语电化教学,1997(1):17-20. 被引量:22
  • 8韩宝成.外语教学科研中的统计方法[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2001.
  • 9胡壮麟.开发电子邮件的研究功能[J].现代外语,1997,:97-97.
  • 10马广惠.中美大学生英语作文语言特征的对比分析[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(5):45-49. 被引量:142

二级参考文献20

  • 1桂诗春.题库建设讲话(一)[J].现代外语,1989,12(4):1-7. 被引量:12
  • 2马广惠.中美大学生英语语篇对比修辞分析[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2001,24(6):5-8. 被引量:51
  • 3王秋海,1999,《美国大学生作文选》[M].北京:世界
  • 4这里,"中国大学生"应定义为"中国理工科大学生".知识出版社.
  • 5Biber, D. 1998. Variation Across Speech and Writing[M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 6Connor, U. 1995. Examining syntactic variation across three English-speaking nationalities through a multifeature/multi-dimensional approach [A]. In D. L.Rubin (ed.). Composing Social Identity in Written Language [ C]. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbanm.
  • 7Dantas-Whitney, M. & W. Grabe. 1989. A comparison of Portuguese and English newspaper editorials [A].Paper presented at the 23rd Annual TFSOL Convention, San Antonio, Texas, 1989.
  • 8Ferris, D. F. 1994. Rhetorical strategies in student persuasive writing: Differences between native and nonnative English speakers [J ]. Research in the Teaching of English 28: 45-63.
  • 9Grabe, W. & D. Biber. 1987. Freshmen student writing and the contrastive rhetoric hypothesis [A]. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Fomm, University of Southern California, 1987.
  • 10Leung, Lily S. K. 1984. The relationship between L1and L2 writing [J]. Language Learning and Communication 1984 (2) :93-142.

共引文献297

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部