摘要
以库恩的“范式”概念及其“科学发展史观”为哲学依据,本文认为整个西方国际关系学科史是一部以现实主义范式所主导的、常规科学研究时期为基础,并间以科学革命阶段的曲线发展史。因此,作为科学的西方国际关系学在不久的将来必将会出现一个主导范式来规范研究,而这一主导范式可能会藉由三种路径得以实现。此外,本文还探讨了处于反常或危机时期的我们这些国际关系研究者的选择与创新之路。
On the basis of 'the concept of 'paradigm' and the structure of scientific development' presented by Thomas S. Kuhn,the article argues that the whole history of IR in west is a curve-lined process with a series of continual periods of normal science interrupted by the period of non-accumulated scientific revolution . Therefore, in the recent future a heading paradigm will e-merge Through Three approaches in the history of IR if the dislipline of IR is still one of social sciences. Additionally,The author analyze how the scholars of IR nowadays select one from many paradigms and make a difference.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第11期69-76,共8页
Teaching and Research
关键词
范式
常规科学
科学革命
国际关系学科吏
现实主义
paradigm
normal science
scientific revolution
history of the discipline of international relations
realism
