期刊文献+

社区居民伤害经济负担的评价框架研究 被引量:8

The study on the evaluation frame for economic burden of injury among community inhabitants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨适合于社区居民伤害经济负担的评价框架。方法 用现场流行病学方法调查的北京居民伤害经济损失资料对所构建的伤害经济负担评价模型进行验证和评价。结果 构建评价社区居民伤害经济负担的模型 (总伤害经济负担 =二步法直接经济负担 +人力资本法间接经济负担 +支付意愿法无形经济负担 ) ,用该方法评价 30 83名居民的全年伤害经济负担为74 4 877元 ,其中直接经济负担 2 99770元 ,间接经济负担为 331382元 ,无形经济负担为 11372 5元。结论 构建的模型在评价社区居民伤害经济负担上有较好的应用价值 ,居民的伤害直接经济负担和间接经济负担相差不大。 Objective To construct a frame to evaluate the economic burden of injury among community inhabitants. Methods The data of injury costs among community inhabitants in Beijing city was used to validate and value the evaluation frame for the economic burden of injury. Results We constructed the model to evaluate the economic burden of injury among community inhabitants (total economic burden of injury=two step method calculating direct economic burden of injury+human capital method calculating indirect economic burden of injury+willingness to pay method evaluating intangible loss). The total economic burden of injury of 3 083 inhabitants in Beijing city was 744 877 yuan, including 299 770 yuan of direct economic burden of injury, 331 382 yuan of indirect economic burden of injury and 113 725 yuan of intangible loss. Conclusions The evaluation frame had good application values on evaluating the economic burden of injury among community inhabitants. The direct economic burden of injury among community inhabitants was close to indirect burden of injury.
出处 《疾病控制杂志》 CAS 2004年第6期506-508,共3页 Chinese Journal of Disease Control and Prevention
基金 卫生部慢性非传染性疾病的预防与控制研究项目 (2 0 0 1 7- 12 )
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1庄润森,王声湧.如何评价疾病的经济负担[J].中国预防医学杂志,2001,2(4):245-247. 被引量:88
  • 2庄润森. 伤害的疾病负担 [A]. 王声湧. 伤害流行病学 [M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2003.113-150.
  • 3Donaldson C. Valuing the benefits of publicly-provided health care:does 'ability to pay' preclude the use of 'willingness to pay' [J]. Soc Sci Med, 1999,49(4):551-563.
  • 4Donaldson C, Jones AM, Mapp TJ, Olson JA. Limit dependent variables in willing to pay studies:applications in health care [J]. Applied Econom, 1998,30(6):667-677.
  • 5Gafni A. Willingness-to-pay as a measure of benefits. Relevant questions in the context of public decision making about health care program [J]. Med Care, 1991,29(12):1246-1252.
  • 6Walraven G. Willingness to pay for district hospital services in rural Tanzania [J]. Health Policy and Plan, 1996,11(4):428-437.
  • 7Gafni A, Birch S. Preferences for outcomes in economic evaluation:an economic approach to addressing economic problems [J]. Soc Sci Med, 1995,40(6):767-776.
  • 8Green D, Jacowitz KE, Kahneman D, et al. Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods [J]. Resource Energy Econ, 1998,20(2):85-116.
  • 9Martin S. The staggering cost of illness and injury [J]. CMAJ, 2003,168(3):332.

二级参考文献5

共引文献87

同被引文献125

引证文献8

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部