期刊文献+

公益性投资项目后评价方法研究 被引量:16

Post-evaluation method for public welfare investment projects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对收益成本分析对于政府的非经济预算决策几乎无效,内部收益率分析法也无多大改进的情况,通过确定评价内容和主要指标,选择可比对象,建立比较指标的对比表.实证研究表明,采用有无对比法对公益性投资项目进行国民经济后评价,将项目实际效果与无项目实际或可能产生的效果进行对比,可以有效地避免收益成本分析和内部收益率分析法不能有效反映出项目社会效益的弊端. The benefit-cost analysis is useless to government's decision making in non-economic budget, so does the method of rate analysis of internal return. In this paper, a method of with and without comparison is presented. By determination of the contents and the main indexes to be evaluated, the objectives to be compared are selected, and a contrast table for the indexes to be compared is established. Case studies show that the application of the with and without comparison method to the post evaluation of national economy, in which the real effect of projects is compared with that under the condition of without projects, can overcome such disadvantage as ineffective reflection of social benefit of projects by the methods of benefit-cost analysis and rate analysis of internal return.
机构地区 河海大学商学院
出处 《河海大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期712-715,共4页 Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences)
关键词 公益性项目 经济后评价 收益-成本 内部收益率 社会效益 public welfare project post evaluation of economy benefit-cost analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1RUUD C. Preparation and implementation of seven ecological compensation plans for dutch highways[J].Environmental Management, 2002,29(6):736-749.
  • 2Asian Development Bank. Project Performance Management System (PPMS)[M].Manila:ADB,1999.439-473.
  • 3朱启贵.国民经济核算在中国[J].统计研究,2002,19(7):12-15. 被引量:4
  • 4黄德春,许长新.投资项目后评价的现有理论及评析[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2003,31(6):706-709. 被引量:28
  • 5Nskayama M. Post project review of environmental impact assessment for Sguling Dam for involuntary resettlement[J].International Journal of Water Resources Development,1998,(14):217-229.

二级参考文献21

  • 1王宗军.面向复杂对象系统的集成式智能化评价支持系统开发环境的设计与实现[J].系统工程学报,1995,10(1):90-96. 被引量:18
  • 2WARD William A DEREN Barry J H D''SILVA Emmanuel 卢有杰译.项目分析经济学实践指南[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2001.78-93.
  • 3HESTON Steven L, NANDI Saikat. A closed-form GARCH option valuation 4 model[ J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2000,130(3) :585-625.
  • 4Project Management Institute. A guide to the project management body of knowledge [ R ]. World Bank, Project Management Institute Standard Committee,2000.213-259.
  • 5GU J F, ZHU Z C, The Wu-li Shi-li Ren-li approach(WSR):an oriental methodology, in systems methodology-Possibilities for crosscultural learning and integration 9 [ M ]. United Kingdom:The University of Hull Press, 1995.31-40.
  • 6ZIMMERMANN H J, LATENT Zysno P. Connectives in human-decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1980,4( 1 ) :37-51.
  • 7WANG M J J. Fuzzy set evaluation of inspection performance[J]. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1991,35(4) :587-596.
  • 8WARDWillianfA DERENBarryJ HD’SILVAEmmanuel 卢有杰译.项目分析经济学实践指南[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2001.78-93.
  • 9王明涛.多指标综合评价中权系数确定的一种综合分析方法[J].系统工程,1999,17(2):56-61. 被引量:169
  • 10王其藩.复杂大系统综合动态分析与模型体系[J].管理科学学报,1999,2(2):15-19. 被引量:55

共引文献30

同被引文献54

引证文献16

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部