期刊文献+

安氏Ⅰ类错与安氏Ⅱ~1错患者颅面关系的研究 被引量:2

A study of the difference of craniofacial pattern in Angle's class Ⅰ and Angle's class Ⅱ division 1 patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨安氏Ⅰ类错牙合与安氏Ⅱ1错牙合患者颅面结构的差异。方法 :随机选取 11~ 14岁的年轻恒牙列病例 45例 ,其中安氏Ⅰ类错牙合2 4例 ,安氏Ⅱ1错牙合 2 1例 ,在正中咬合位时拍摄X线头颅定位侧位片 ,比较两者颅面结构的差异。结果 :安氏Ⅱ1错牙合患者SNB、ANB、SNPg、FMA的测量值大于安氏Ⅰ类错牙合患者 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,而SNA、PP SN、OP SN、GoGn SN的测量值两者间无显著差异。结论 :安氏Ⅰ类错牙合与安氏Ⅱ1类错牙合X线头影测量的主要差异是下颌位置的异常。 Objective:To detect the difference of craniofacial pattern in Angle's class Ⅰ and Angle'class Ⅱ division 1 patients. Method : Twenty-four class Ⅰ and twenty-one class Ⅱ division 1 patients with early permanent dentition were selected randomly, aged from 11 years old to 14 years old. Lateral cephalographs were taken for each patient and differences of craniofacial pattern were compared.Result: The angles of SNB、ANB、SNPg、FMA in class Ⅱ patients were larger than that of class Ⅰ patients, but there were no difference in angles of SNA、PP-SN、OP-SN、GoGn-SN. Conclusion: The main differences of craniofacial pattern in Angle's class Ⅰ and Angle'class Ⅱ division 1 patients rely on the location of the mandible.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2004年第12期751-752,共2页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
关键词 头影测量 颅面结构 安氏Ⅰ类错He 安氏Ⅱ^1类错He cephalometry craniofacial structure Angle's class Ⅰ Angle's class Ⅱ
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献3

共引文献16

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部