期刊文献+

霍乱毒素B亚单位和旋毛虫幼虫抗原诱导黏膜免疫结果分析 被引量:2

Investigation of cholera toxin subunit B and Trichinella spiralis laval antigen induced mucosal immunity
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨黏膜佐剂霍乱毒素B 亚单位(CT-B )在激发旋毛虫感染的黏膜免疫中的作用。方法24只NI H 小鼠随机分为4 组,每组6 只。CT-B 免疫组:每只小鼠于0 、7 、14 d 用含幼虫抗原100 μg 、C T-B 10 μg 的免疫原200 μl 经口灌服;正常对照组;免疫后感染组:免疫方法同CT-B 免疫组,末次免疫后第7 天,每只小鼠用200 条旋毛虫进行感染;单纯感染组:不免疫,与免疫后感染组同时进行感染。CT 蛳B 免疫组与正常对照组在免疫后第7 天、免疫后感染组与单纯感染组在感染后第7 天分别取血检测Ig A 、Ig G 1 、Ig G 2 b ,刮取肠黏液检测sIgA ,检测肠道成虫数,并收集每鼠雌虫,在体外检查其生殖力。结果与单纯感染组相比,CT-B 免疫后感染组肠道成虫数明显减少,雌虫生殖力明显降低,成虫与新生幼虫减虫率分别为88.2%和72.4%。CT-B 免疫组小鼠肠黏液sIg A 、血清Ig A 较对照组小鼠明显提高(0 .2 9 ±0 .04 vs 0.09 ±0.02,0.21 ±0.06 vs 0.08 ±0.01,P <0.001);而两组Ig G 1 和Ig G 2 b 水平无显著性差异(P>0.05)。CT-B 免疫后感染组小鼠肠黏液sIg A 、血清Ig A 较单纯感染组小鼠相比有显著性差异(0 .5 5 ±0 .28 vs0.08 ±0.15,0.33 ±0.06 vs 0.10 ±0.10,P <0.001)。 objective To investigate the effect of CT-B on the mucosal immunity of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis(T. spiralis). Methods Twenty four NIH mice were randomly divided into four groups. Group1:immunized mice group was immunized orally with the mixture of 10μg CT-B and 100μg T. Sprialis muscle larval soluble antigen on day 0, 7 and 14 . Group 2: normal control group. Group 3: CT-B immunized and infected group ie, the mice were immunized as group 1, then challenged with 200 T. Spiralis infective muscle larvae on day 7 . Group 4: The only mice of infected group, were challenged stimutaneously with group 3. Group 3 and group 4 were sacrificed on the 7th day after their infection, intestinal adults worms, female worm fecundity and the level of sIgA and serum IgA were analyzed. Parallely the level sIgA and IgA in group 1 and group 2 were analyzing. Results Compared with INF group, CT-B+INF group showed a significant reduction in the number of intestinal adult worms and newborn larvae, the rate of reduction in adult worm and newborn larvae was 88.2% and 72.4% respectively. The level of sIgA and IgA was significantly higher in CT-B group than that in C group(0.29 ± 0.04 vs 0.09±0.02 and 0.21±0.06 vs 0.08±0.01 respectively, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was found in the level of IgG1 and IgG2b between the two groups(P > 0.05). Similarly, there was significant difference in the level of sIgA and serum IgA between CT-B+INF group and INF group(0.55 ± 0.28 vs 0.08 ± 0.15 and 0.33 ± 0.06 vs 0.10 ± 0.10,P < 0.001), no significant difference in the level of IgG1 and IgG2b between the two group(P > 0.05). Conclusions CT-B can induce not only mucosal immune responses by increasing the level of sIgA, but also systemic immune responses through enhancing the level of IgA, this suggests that CT-B can improve the effect of protective immunity to a subsequent challenge infection of T. Spiralis.
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 2005年第1期39-41,共3页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 霍乱毒素B亚单位 旋毛虫幼虫抗原 诱导 黏膜免疫 Trichinella spiralis Cholera toxin subunit B(CT-B) Mucosal immunity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Coogan MM, Sweet SP, Challacombe SJ. Immunoglobulin A(IgA), IgA1 and IgA2 antibodies to Candida albicans in whole and parotid saliva in human immunodeficiency virus infection and AIDS. Infect Immun, 1994, 62:892 - 896.
  • 2Bourguin I, Chardes T, Mevelec M, et al. Amplication of the secretory IgA response to Toxoplasma gondii using cholera toxin. FEMS Microbiology Letter, 1991, 81:265 - 272.
  • 3DeVos T, Dick TA. Trichinella spiralis: the effect of oral immunization and the adjuvancy of Cholera Toxin on the mucosal and systemic immune response of mice. Exp Parasitol , 1993, 76:182 -191.
  • 4Bromander A, Holmgren J , Lycke N. Cholera toxin stimulates IL-1 production and enhances antigen presentation by macrophages invitro. J Immunol, 1991, 146:2908 - 2914.
  • 5Kim PH, Eckmann L, Lee WJ, et al. Cholera toxin and cholera toxin B subunit induce IgA switching through the action of TGF-bata 1.J Immunol, 1998, 160:1198 - 1203.

同被引文献16

  • 1刘英杰,赵粤萍.血清旋毛虫p49抗原IgG抗体的斑点金免疫渗滤法检测[J].中国人兽共患病杂志,2004,20(6):533-534. 被引量:5
  • 2[2]Pozio E,Sofronic Milosavljevic L,Gomez Morales MA,et al.Evaluation of ELISA and Western Blot Analysis using three antigens to detect anti-Trichinella IgG in horses[J].Vet Parasitol,2002,108 (2):163-178.
  • 3[3]Nockler K,Hamidi A,Fries R,et al.Influence of methods for Trichinella detection in pigs from endemic and non-endemic European region[J].J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health,2004,51 (6):297-301.
  • 4[4]Piergili Fioretti D,Moretti A,Marini C,et al.Trichinella spp.in ostrich meat:a public health risk[J].Parasite,2001,8(2 Suppl):203-205.
  • 5De Vos, T, G. Danell, T. A. Dick 1992 Trichinella spiralis: dose dependence and kinetics of the mucosal immune response in mice. Exp. Parasitol, 75 (1): 99-111.
  • 6Isaka, M, Y. Yssuda, S. Kozuka et al. 1998 Systemic and mucosal immune responses of mice to aluminium-adsorbed or aluminium-non-adsorbed tetanus toxoid administered intranasally with recombinant cholera taxin B subunit. Vaccine, 16 (17) : 1 620 - 1 626.
  • 7Lycke, N. 2005 From toxin to adjuvant: Basic mechanisms for the control of mucosal IgA immunity and tolerance. Immunol. Lett, 97 (2): 193 - 198.
  • 8MacDonald, T. T. 2003 The mucosal immune system. Parasite Immunol, 25 (5) : 235- 246.
  • 9Robinson, K, T. Bellaby, D. Wakelin 1995 Oral and parenteral vaccination against Trichinellca spiralis infections in high- and lowresponder mice. Int. J. Parasitol, 25 (8) : 989 - 992.
  • 10Wu, Z, I. Nagano, Y. Takahashi 1999 A panel of antigens of muscle larvae of Trichinella spiralis and T. pseudospiralls as revealed by two dimensional Wastem blot and immunoolectron microscopy. Parasitology, 118 (6) : 615 - 622.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部