期刊文献+

腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与开腹直肠癌根治术的临床对比 被引量:11

Comparison of laparoscopic and openradical by resection of rectal carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨应用腹腔镜技术行直肠癌根治术的可行性及近期临床疗效。方法 选择2 0 0 3年 2月至 2 0 0 4年 8月我科行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术 2 4例 (Dixon手术 15例、Miles手术 9例 ) ,开腹直肠癌根治术患者 30例 (Dixon手术 2 2例、Miles手术 8例 ) ,对照研究两组病人手术及术后情况。结果 腹腔镜组与开腹组的平均手术时间为 2 0 1.4 6min和 15 6 .33min ,有显著差异 (P <0 .0 1) ,但随着例数的增加腹腔镜手术的时间呈明显下降趋势 ,后 12例病人的平均手术时间为 172 .92min ,与开腹组比较无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。腹腔镜组术中失血量明显少于开腹组 (12 9.17mlvs393.33ml,P <0 .0 1) ,清除的淋巴结数量无显著差异 (11.75枚vs13.2 7枚 ,P >0 .0 5 )。腹腔镜组术后胃肠功能和排尿功能恢复时间明显早于开腹组 (排气、进流食时间 2 .4 6dvs3.6 7d ,P <0 .0 1;进固体饮食时间 3.5 4dvs4 .70d ,P <0 .0 1;留置导尿时间 4 .17dvs5 .97d ,P <0 .0 1)。腹腔镜组住院时间明显短于开腹组(9.5 4dvs12 .97d ,P <0 .0 1) ,住院费用仍明显高于开腹组 (2 .2 7万元vs1.92万元 ,P <0 .0 5 )。结论 应用腹腔镜技术行直肠癌根治术安全可行 ,切除范围能够达到开腹手术的水平 ,且具有创伤小、出血少、术后恢复快等特点 ,极具? Objective To study the feasibility and curative effect of laparoscopic radical resection of rectal carcinoma. Methods Fifty four cases were chosen who underwent radical resection of rectal carcinoma in our department from Feb. 2003 to Aug. 2004. Twenty four cases underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal carcinoma (fifteen cases underwent Dixon and nine cases underwent Miles), and the other thirty cases underwent open radical resection of rectal carcinoma (twenty two cases underwent Dixon and eight cases underwent Miles). The clinical data of patients in two groups were compared. Results The mean operation time of laparoscopic group was 201.46 min, and open group was 156.33 min. There is significant difference (P<0.01). But along with number of the laparoscopic cases increased, the operation time tended to decline. The mean operation time of latter twelve cases was 172.92 min. There is no significant difference compared with that of the open group (P>0.05). The intra operative blood loss of the laparoscopic group was obviously less than that of the open group (129.17 ml vs 393.33 ml, P<0.01). There was no significant difference between the number of cleared lymphaden (11.75 pieces vs 13.27 pieces, P>0.05). The gastrointestinal and urinary function of laparoscopic group recovered quickly than the open group. The hospitalization stay of the laparoscopic group was shorter than that of the open group (9.54 day vs 12.97 day, P<0.01). But the cost of laparoscopic group was higher than that of the open group (22.7 thousand yuan vs 19.2 thousand yuan, P<0.05). Conclusions Laparoscopic radical resection of rectal carcinoma is feasible and minimally invasive. This operation has much lower blood loss during operation similar resection range of the open operation, earlier recovery of function and shorter hospitalization.
出处 《消化外科》 CSCD 2005年第1期10-13,共4页 Journal of Digestive Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 直肠肿瘤 手术 laparoscopic rectal carcinoma operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Rullier E, Sa Cunha A, Couderc P, et al. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer[J]. Br J Surg,2003,90(4):445-451
  • 2Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients[J]. Ann Surg,2003,237(3):335-342
  • 3Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, et al. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2002,45(12):1648-1654
  • 4Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, et al. Rectal cancer: the basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997[J]. Arch Surg,1998,133(8):894-899
  • 5郑民华.腹腔镜在腹部非胆囊手术中的应用[J].中国实用外科杂志,2004,24(1):27-29. 被引量:62
  • 6傅卫,袁炯,陆少美,张自顺,张同琳.腹腔镜下腹—会阴联合直肠癌切除术(附9例长期随访报告)[J].中国微创外科杂志,2003,3(1):22-23. 被引量:11

二级参考文献2

共引文献68

同被引文献84

引证文献11

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部