期刊文献+

经颅多普勒超声微栓子检测技术中分贝阈值的选择 被引量:2

Selection of decibel threshold for Detecting Doppler Embolic signals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 通过采用EMETC 2 0 2 0型PioneerVersion 2 .1检测系统对正常人大脑中动脉进行监测 ,以期获得帮助确定栓子信号分贝 (dB)阈值的参考数据。方法 正常人 50名按年龄分为 3组 (≤ 30岁 1 0名 ;>65岁 2 0名 ;30~ 65岁2 0名 ) ,选用相同技术参数监测大脑中动脉 30min。结果  30min内总的信号数及不同dB值信号 (3~ 6dB)的频率之间 ,3组比较差异无显著性意义 ;30min内未出现 7dB值以上的信号 ;不同dB值信号的出现频率分别为 :3dB 87.0 7%(1 0 1 / 1min) ,4dB 1 1 .64 % (1 2 / 30min) ,5dB 1 .1 8% (1 / 30min) ,6dB 0 .1 0 % (0 .1 / 30min)。结论 采用EMETC 2 0 2 0型TCD仪作循环中微栓子检测时 ,栓子的信号阈值应≥ Objective To improve reproducibility and reliability in the identification of embolic signals detected by Doppler ultrasound.Various thresholds between 3 and 12dB have been used,but different methods of measurement with different machines could result in different decibel intensity for the same embolic signal. Therefore, we examined 50 normal volunteers for 30 minutes using EME TC 2020 pioneer automatic embolus software in order to get information about what is a decibel threshold in detecting Doppler embolic signals. Methods Fifty normal volunteers were divided into 3 groups based on ages (10 cases ≤30 years, 20 cases >65 years and 20 cases 30~65 years).Recordings were made for middle cerebral artery for 30 minutes with the same parameters. Results Among the 3 groups, no significant differences were found in total episode numbers and proportional ratio of different intensity signals (3dB,4dB, 5dB, 6dB). During the 30 minute examination, no signal≥7dB was recorded. Frequencies of signals of different intensities were: 3dB 87.07% (101/1 minutes), 4dB 11.65%(12/30minutes), 5dB 1.18%(1/30 minutes), and 6dB 0.1%(0.1/30 minutes). Conclusion Using the EME TC 2020 Pioneer, the decibel threshold of Doppler embolic signals must be ≥5dB.
出处 《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》 CAS 1999年第1期30-31,34,共3页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart,Brain and Vessel Diseases
关键词 TCD 栓子 dB阈值 TCD embolus decibel threshold
  • 相关文献

同被引文献23

  • 1中华神经科学会 中华神经外科学会.各类脑血管病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,6:379-379.
  • 2中华神经科学会.脑血管疾病分类诊断要点,神经功能缺损程度评分标准[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):376-376.
  • 3[1]Rossell Ross.The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis:a perspective for the1990s[J].Nature,1993,362(6423):801-808.
  • 4[2]Libby P.Changing concepts of atherogenesis[J].J Intern Med,2000,247(3):349-358.
  • 5[3]Libby P,Ridker P M.Novel inflammatory markers of coronary risk:theoryversus practice[J].Circulation,1999,100(11):148-1150.
  • 6[4]Jander S,Sitzer M,Schumann R,et al.Inflammation in high-grade carotid stenosis.A possible role for macrophages and T cells in plaque destabilization[J].Stroke,1998,29(8):1625-1630.
  • 7[5]Loftus I,Naylor R,goodall S,et al.Increased matrix metalloproteinase-9activity in unstable carotid plaques.A potential role in acute plaque disruption[J].Stroke,2000,31(1):40-47.
  • 8[7]International consensus group on microembolus detection.Consensus on microembolus detection by TCD[J].Stroke,1998,29(3):725-729.
  • 9[10]Newby A C,Libby P,van der Wal A C.Plaque instability-the real challenge for atherosclerosis research in the next decade[J]? Cardiovasc Res,1999,41(2):321-322.
  • 10[11]Mach F,Schonbeck U,Sukhova G K,et al.Reduction of atherosclerosisin mice by inhibition of CD40 signaling[J].Nature,1998,394(6689):200-203.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部