期刊文献+

不同英语语法教学效果对比 被引量:12

A Comparative Study of Implicit and Explicit Grammar Instruction for Vocational College Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文是一个实验研究。对象是74名中国二年级文秘专业高职大专生,目的是比较两种不同英语语法教学方法的效果(隐性教学与显性教学),采用的语法项目为分裂句或称强调句、倒装句和that-间接引语。实验进行了前测和两次后测。根据前测,31位学生构成隐性教学组, 43位学生组成显性教学组。两次后测的Z检验表明,两种教学方法总体上没有显著差别。这可能是因为两组学生以相似的程度接受了可理解性输入并支持了Krashen的可理解性输入在二语习得中的必要性和重要性。本文还指出了这次实验的教学启示。
出处 《国外外语教学》 CSSCI 2005年第1期45-50,共6页 Foreign Language Teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Cadierno, T. 1995. "Formal instruction from a processing perspective: an investigation into the Spanish past tense" The Modern Language Journal 79/2.
  • 2DeKyser, R. 1994. "Implicit and explicit learning of L2 grammar: a pilot study". TESOL Quarterly 28.
  • 3Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 4Green, P. S, & K. Hecht. "Implicit and explicit grammar; an empirical study". Applied Linguistics 13/2.
  • 5Haley, M. H. & 17. Rentz. "Applying SLA research and theory "to practice: what can a teacher do"? http: //www-writing. Berkeley. edu/TESL-EJ/ ej20/a2, htm (May- 17- 2003).
  • 6Hamre, S. "Grammar teaching in the new century - an impossible challenge for teachers", http: //web. hisf. no: 16068/english/projects/grammar/ (February - 29 - 2003).
  • 7Herron, C. & M. Tomasello. "Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction". French Review 63/5.
  • 8McCarthy, M. & R. Carter. "Spoken grammar: what is it and how can we teach it?". ELT Journal 49/ 3.
  • 9Nachiengmai, Y. "The teaching of grammar", http: //www. thaitesol, org/bulletin/1002/100206. html (April - 29 - 2003).
  • 10Norris, J. M. & L. Ortega, 2001. "Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review". Language Learning 51/5.

同被引文献125

引证文献12

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部