期刊文献+

腰骶融合椎弓根螺钉三皮质固定术生物力学特征与骨密度的关系 被引量:1

Relationship between biomechanical feature of tricortical pedicle screw fixation in lumbosacral fusion and bone mineral density
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较腰骶融合椎弓根螺钉三皮质固定技术与双皮质固定技术的最大旋入力矩,明确最大旋入力矩与骨质密度的关系。方法:实验于2002-10/2004-01在河北省骨科研究所生物力学实验室完成。选择10具新鲜成人的腰骶椎骨骼标本,先用双能X射线吸收仪测量每具标本的骨质密度。分别向骶骨岬方向置入(三皮质固定技术或平行终板方向置入双质固定技术)一枚7.5mm椎弓根螺钉,用)(扭转传感器测量螺钉每旋转一圈所产生的最大力矩以及螺钉旋入总长度的10%,20%,30%,40%,50%,60%,70%,80%,90%,100%时的最大旋入力矩,并加以比较分析。结果:全组标本的平均骨质密度为(0.940±0.232)g/cm(0.600~21.432g/cm)。应用三皮质固定技术时,螺钉最大旋入力矩与骨质密度2呈正相关关系(r=0.832,P=0.003),而应用双皮质固定技术时,螺钉最大旋入力矩与骨质密度无相关关系(r=0.544,P=0.104)。三皮质固定技术螺钉最大旋入力矩明显大于双皮质固定技术螺钉最大旋入力矩(P<0.05)。结论:腰骶融合椎弓根螺钉的三皮质固定技术的最大旋入力矩较双皮质固定技术的最大旋入力矩增加了98.6%,具有一定的生物力学优势。骨质密度与三皮质固定技术的最大旋入力矩直接相关,可以作为三皮质固定技术的最大旋入力矩的预测因素。 AIM:To compare the maximal insertional torque of tricortical pedicle screw fix ation versus bicotrcal pedicle screw fixation in lumboscaral fusion and confirm the relationship between the maximal insertional torque and bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS:This experiment was conducted in the Hebei Provincial Research Institu te of Orthopaedics from October 2002 to January 2004.Lumbosacral vertebral bone specimens of 10 fresh frozen cadaver sacra were harvested and evaluated with dua l energy radiograph absorptiometry to assess BMD.Under direct visualization,7.5 mm monoaxial stainless steel pedicle screws were placed parallel to end plate( bicotrcal technique) or into the apex of the sacral promontory(tricortical techn ique).Maximum insertional torque was recorded and matched for each screw revolut ion and 10%,20%,30%,40%,50%,60%,70%,80%,90%,100%of total screw length with a torsion transducer. RESULTS:The mean BMD was(0.940±0.232) g/cm2(0.600 to 1.432 g/cm2) in all the specimens.The BMD was positively correlated with maximal insertional torque the tricortical technique(r=0.832,P=0.003),but not correlated with the maximal inse rtional torque for the bicortical technique(r=0.544,P=0.104).Maximum insertional torque of tricortical technique was larger than that of bicortical technique(P< 0.05). CONCLUSION:Compared with bicortical screws,the tricortical screws used for lum bosacral fusion resulted in an average 98.6%increase in maximal insertional tor que,and are of biomechanical advantage.BMD fixation correlates directly with max imal insertional torque of tricortical technique and can act as a predictor for it.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期95-97,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1丛锐,孙银中,李明全,罗卓荆,雷伟,冯立宁,李小娟.腰椎滑脱症患者的骨密度变化分析[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(3):385-386. 被引量:5
  • 2刘文军,廖进民,谭小云,伦报国,赵卫东,钟世镇.椎体骨密度、体积骨密度与生物力学强度的比较[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(5):880-881. 被引量:11
  • 3王正,沈国平,陈伟兵,王以进.椎弓根螺钉内固定稳定性的生物力学分析(英文)[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(14):2755-2757. 被引量:5
  • 4Temple HT, Kruse RW, Vandam BE. Lumbar and lumbosacral fusion using Steffee instrumentation. Spine 1994; 19: 537- 41.
  • 5Carlson GD, Abitbol JJ, Anderson DR, et al. Screw fixation in the human sacrum:an in vitro study of the biomechanics of fixation. Spine 1992; 17:196 - 203.
  • 6Esses SI, Botsford DJ, Huler RJ, et al. Surgical anatomy of the sacrum: a guide for rational screw fixation. Spine 1991; 16:S283 - 8.
  • 7Bradford DS. Adult scoliosis current concepts of treatment. Clin Orthop 1988;229:70 - 87.
  • 8Camp JF, Caudle R, Ashman RD. Fusion to the sacrum for nonparalytic scoliosis in the adult. Spine 1986; 11: 824- 9.
  • 9Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL, The Galveston experience with L-rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop 1988; 229:59 -69.
  • 10Balderston RA, Winter RB, More JH, et al. Fusion of the sacrum for nonparalytic scoliosis in the adult. Spine 1986; 11:824 -9.

二级参考文献10

共引文献18

同被引文献12

  • 1Karim A,Mukherjee D,Ankem M,et al.Augmentation of anterior lumbar inter body fusion with anterior pedicle screw fixation:demonstration of novel constructs and evaluation of biomechanical stability in cadaveric specimens[J].Neurosurgery,2006,58(3):522-527.
  • 2Dai L Y,Jiang L S,Wang W,et al.Single-stage anterior autoge-noun bone grafting and instrumentation in the surgical management of spinal tuberculosis[J].Spine,2005,30 (20):2342-2349.
  • 3Chen W J.Wu C C,Jung C H,et al.Combined anteriorand posterior surgeries in the treatment of spinal tuberculous spondylitis[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2002,(398):50-59.
  • 4Ozdemir H M,Us A K,Ogun T.The role of anterior spinal instrumentation and allograft fibula for the treatment of pott disease[J].Spine,2003,28(5):474-479.
  • 5刘文军,廖进明,谭小云,等.椎体骨密度、体积骨密度与生物力学强度的比较[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(2):385-386.
  • 6Krag M H,Wiesel S W,Weinstein J N,et al.Biomechanics of transpedicle spinal fixation[J].Spine,1990,16(6):916-940.
  • 7Lebwohl N H,Cunningham B W,Dmitriev A,et al.Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation techniques in a calf spine model[J].Spine,2002,27(21):2312-2320.
  • 8Kim Y J,Bridwell K H,Lenke L G,et al.Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum:prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases[J].Spine,2006,31(20):2329-2336.
  • 9Zhu Q,Lu W W,Holmes A D,et al.The effects of cyclic loading on pull-out strength of sacral screw fixation:an in vitro biomechanical study[J].Spine,2000,25(9):1065-1069.
  • 10McLachlin S D,Beaton B J,Sabo M T,et al.Comparing the fixation of a novel hollow screw versus aconventional solid screw in human sacra under cyclic loading loading[J].Spine,2008,33(17):1870-1875.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部