期刊文献+

WEPP模型中细沟可蚀性参数估计方法误差的理论分析 被引量:21

Theoretical analysis of estimation error of soil erodibility for rill erosion in WEPP model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 细沟土壤侵蚀在坡面土壤侵蚀占有重要地位。土壤可蚀性参数是WEPP模型中计算预报/计算细沟土壤侵蚀中极其重要的参数。WEPP模型现在采用的可蚀性参数是用长的细沟/径流小区试验以细沟侵蚀产沙估计得到的最大可能剥蚀率为基础获得的。该文分析了细沟侵蚀产沙随沟长的变化关系,分析了可蚀性参数估计误差的来源。从理论上推导出了计算现有WEPP可蚀性参数估计误差的计算方法。理论分析表明,对于限定性细沟,可蚀性参数的估计误差主要来源于细沟最大可能剥蚀率的估计值。最大可能剥蚀率的理想估计值是水流载沙量与细沟长度的函数关系在细沟长度为0时的导数,而不是全沟长的平均剥蚀率。理论计算表明,已有方法估计得到的WEPP模型可蚀性参数,其误差可以高达90%以上,最低也在50%以上。从而,估计WEPP可蚀性参数的方法和可蚀性参数需要加以重新考虑。提出了减少误差方法的建议。 Rill erosion is of great significance in hill-slope erosion. Soil erodibility for rill erosion is a very important parameter for soil erosion prediction with Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model. The estimation of the soil erodibility needed by WEPP was based on the potential detachment rate of rill erosion, measured with long rill channel. The dynamical erosion processes along a rill caused estimation error of the erodibility. Theoretical algorithm was given for determining the estimation error of the present method. Theoretical analysis indicated that for a well-defined rill channel, the estimation error of erodibility was mainly from the error of potential detachment estimation. The ideal estimated value of the potential detachment rate was the derivative value, at the initial position, of the function between sediment load and rill length. Computated results showed that the error in erodibility presently used in WEPP model was as high as 90% with the lowest value being higher than 50%. Therefore, it was suggested that both the method and the erodibility data for the WEPP model need to be reexamined and reevaluated. Possible ways for reduction of estimation error of the parameter were suggested.
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第1期9-12,共4页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 教育部重大项目"细沟土壤侵蚀动力过程模型模拟及其基本参数的系统研究" 中国科学院知识创新重要方向项目(KZCX3-SW-422) 科技部973项目(2002CB111502)资助
关键词 WEPP 土壤侵蚀 模型参数 误差分析 WEPP soil erosion model parameters error analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1郑粉莉,唐克丽,周佩华.坡耕地细沟侵蚀影响因素的研究[J].土壤学报,1989,26(2):109-116. 被引量:92
  • 2[1]Beaseley D B,Huggins L F,Monke E J.ANSWERS:A model for water planning.Trans.of ASAE,1980,23:938~944
  • 3[2]Mogan R P C,Morgan D D V,Finney H J.A predictive model for the assessment of soil erosion risk.J.Agr.Eng.Res.,1984,30:245~253
  • 4[3]Nearing M A,Forster G,Lane L J,Finkner S C.A Process-based soil erosion model for USDA-watererosion prediction project technology.Trans.of ASAE,1989,32(5):1587~1593
  • 5[4]Elliot W J,Laflen J M.A process-based rill erosion model.Trans.of ASAE,1993,36(1):65~72
  • 6[5]Abrahams A D,Gang L,Parsons A J.Rill hydraulics on a semiarid hillslope,southern Arizona.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1996,21:35~47
  • 7[6]Gilley J E,Kottwitz E R,Simanton J R Hydraulic characteristics of rills.Trans.of ASAE,1990,33:1900~1906
  • 8[7]Moss A J.Thin-flow transportation of solids in arid and non-arid areas:A comparison.IAHS-AISH Publ.,1979,128:435~445
  • 9[8]Foster G R,Huggins L F,Meyer L D.A laboratory study of rill hydraulics:I.Velocity relationship.Trans.of ASAE,1984,27(3):790~796
  • 10[9]Shen H W.In Sedimentation:Symposium to Honor Professor H.A.Einstein,Fort Collins,CO:Colorado State Univ.,1975,12.1~12.19

共引文献157

同被引文献305

引证文献21

二级引证文献227

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部