期刊文献+

耗能减震加固结构的性能水准与设防目标 被引量:7

Performance Levels and Fortification Objects of Seismic Retrofitting of Structure with Dissipators
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以国内外有关结构性能水准和性能目标的主要研究结果为基础 ,根据耗能减震加固结构的特点 ,结合我国《建筑抗震设计规范》(GB5 0 0 11 2 0 0 1)的要求和基于性能抗震加固设计理论 ,将耗能减震加固结构的性能分为四个水准 :健康、亚健康、病态、生命安全。针对不同重要性类别的建筑提出了三个层次的设防目标 :“小震不坏 ,中震可修 ,大震不倒”、“中震不坏 ,大震可修”、“大震不坏”。最后 ,将设防目标进行了量化。 Based on the state-of-the-art about structure performance levels and performance objects at home and abroad, in accordance with the characteristics of seismic retrofitting of structure with dissipators, and the requirements of the Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (GB50011-2001) and the theory of performance-based seismic retrofitting design, the performance of seismic retrofitting of structure with dissipators is classified as four levels: healthy, hypo-healthy, sick, and safe. Three levels of fortification objects are also put forward for various buildings with different factors of importance. They are “no damage for small earthquakes, repairable for moderate earthquakes and no collapse for large earthquakes”, “no damage for moderate earthquakes and repairable for large earthquakes” and “no damage for large earthquakes”. The fortification objects are quantified as well.
出处 《工程抗震与加固改造》 2004年第6期35-40,共6页 Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting
基金 建设部科技攻关项目 (0 1 2 0 0 9)
关键词 耗能减震加固 性能水准 设防目标 抗震结构 seismic retrofitting of structure with dissipators performance levels fortification objects
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1GB50011-2001.建筑抗震设计规范[S].[S].,..
  • 2Vision 2000 Committee. Performance-based engineering of building [ C ]. Miranda E. Seismology Committee of the Structure Engineer Association of California, Oakland:Wiley Inc, 1995.
  • 3Chopra A K and Goel B K. Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods for Estimating Seismic Deformation of Inelastic Structures: SDOF Systems[R]. Report No. PEER-1999/02. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California at Berkeley, 1999.
  • 4Qiang Xue. A Direct Displacement-Based Seismic Design Procedure of Inelastic Structures [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 2001 (23).
  • 5Elnashai A S. Advanced Inelastic Static(Pushover) Analysis for Earthquake Applications[J]. Structures Engineering and Mechanics, 2001 (12) .
  • 6FEMA273/274. HEHRP Commentary on the Guidelines for the rehabitation of Buildings[ R]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. 11,1996.
  • 7ATC-40. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building[ R]. Applied Technology Council. Red Wood City,California, 1996.
  • 8小谷俊介,叶列平.日本基于性能结构抗震设计方法的发展[J].建筑结构,2000,30(6):3-9. 被引量:112
  • 9TAKAMI Shinji YOSHIOKA Kenzo, ETO Hiroaki, YONEZA kenji and WAKAMATSU kunio. Performance-based seismic design method of ultra-high rise reinforced concrete buildings[ C]. Eerva A, ed. 12th world conf on Earthquake Eng. Mexico: WCEE.2000-1391, 2000.
  • 10刘伯权.抗震结构的破坏准则及可靠性分析[M].北京:中国建材工业出版社,1995.

二级参考文献29

  • 1邓小刚.多层钢筋砼框架房屋的震害预测方法[J].工程抗震,1993(1):28-33. 被引量:13
  • 2孙克俭.钢筋砼典则框架结构的位移延性与延性分析[J].建筑结构,1993,23(8):31-38. 被引量:3
  • 3王广军.建筑地震破坏等级的工程划分及应用[J].世界地震工程,1993,9(2):40-45. 被引量:10
  • 4王光远 王文泉.抗震结构的模糊优化设计[J].土木工程学报,1985,(2).
  • 5王光远 吕大刚 等.抗灾结构最优设防荷载的决策.国家自然科学基金“八五”重大项目201课题成果报告[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨建筑大学,1997..
  • 6顾平.基于最优设防烈度的高层建筑结构抗震优化设计(硕士学位论文)[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨建筑大学,1995..
  • 7高小旺 鲍霭斌.用概率方法确定抗震设防标准[J].建筑结构学报,1986,(2).
  • 8民用建筑抗震组.阳江地震中多层砖房的震害及其地震荷载系数的反算[A]..地震工程研究报告集[C].,1977.159-185.
  • 9.CB50011—2001.建筑抗震设计规范[S].,..
  • 10刘伯权.抗震结构的破坏准则及可靠性分析[M].北京:中国建材工业出版社,1995..

共引文献2518

同被引文献194

引证文献7

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部