期刊文献+

DEM提取黄土高原地面坡度的不确定性 被引量:178

Modeling Slope Uncertainty Derived from DEMs in Loess Plateau
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选择陕北黄土高原6个典型地貌类型区为试验样区,采用野外实测及高精度的1:1万比例尺DEM为基准数据,研究栅格分辨率及地形粗糙度对DEM所提取地面平均坡度精度的影响。结果显示,对于1:1万比例尺DEM,5 m是保证该地区地形描述精度的理想分辨率尺度;多要素逐步回归模拟的方法进一步揭示了DEM所提取的地面平均坡度误差E与栅格分辨率X以及地形起伏的代表性因子—沟壑密度S之间存在的量化关系为E = (0.0015S2+0.031S-0.0325)X-0.0045S2-0.155S+0.1625,该结果也为确定适用的DEM分辨率提供了理论依据。 Slope is one of crucial terrain variables in spatial analysis and land use planning, especially in the Loess Plateau area of China where rugged terrains enhance serious soil erosion. DEM based on slope extracting method has been widely accepted and applied in practice. However slope accuracy derived from this method usually does not match with their popularity. A quantitative simulation to slope data uncertainty is important not only theoretically but also necessarily to applications. This paper focuses on how resolution and terrain complexity impact the accuracy of mean slope extracted from DEMs of different resolutions in the Loess Plateau. Six typical geomorphologic areas are selected as test areas, representing different terrain types from smooth to rough. Their DEMs are produced from digitizing contours of 1:10000 scale topographical maps. Field survey results show that 5 m should be the most suitable grid size for representing slope in loess area. Comparative and math-simulation methodology was employed for data processing and analysis. A linear correlativity between mean slope and DEM resolution was found at all test areas, but their regression coefficients were closely related with the terrain complexity of the test areas. If stream channel density was taken to represent terrain complexity, mean slope error could be regressed against DEM resolution (X) and stream channel density (S) at 8 resolution levels could be expressed as (0.0015S 2 + 0.031S-0.0325)X-0.0045S 2 -0.155S+ 0.1625, with a R 2 value of over 0.98. Practical tests also show an effective result of this model in applications.
出处 《地理学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2003年第6期824-830,共7页 Acta Geographica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(40271089) 国家高技术研究发展计划课题(2001AA130023) 测绘遥感信息工程国家重点实验室高级访问学者基金 ~~
关键词 数字高程模型 DEM 黄土高原 地面坡度 分辨率 数据不确定性 基准数据 Loess Plateau DEM slope resolution uncertainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Tang Guoan.A Research on the Accuracy of Digital Elevation Models Beijing and New York:Science Press,2000.
  • 2Ahmadzadeh M R, Petrou M. Error statistics for slope and aspect when derived from interpolated data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2001, 39(9): 1823-1833.
  • 3汤国安,杨勤科,张勇,刘咏梅,刘新华.不同比例尺DEM提取地面坡度的精度研究——以在黄土丘陵沟壑区的试验为例[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(1):53-56. 被引量:102
  • 4Bolstad P V, Stowe T. An evaluation of DEM accuracy - elevation, slope, and aspect. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1994, 60(11): 1327-1332.
  • 5Giles P, Franklin S E. Comparison of derivation topographic surfaces of a DEM generated from stereoscopic SPOT images with field measurements. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1996, 62(10): 1165-1171.
  • 6Chang K, Tsai B. The effect of DEM resolution on slope and aspect mapping. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 1991, 18(1): 69-77.
  • 7Carter J. The effect of data precision on the calculation of slope and aspect using gridded DEMs. Cartographica, 1992,29(1): 22-34.
  • 8Gao J. Resolution and accuracy of terrain representation by grid DEMs at a micro-scale. Int. J. Geographical Information Science, 1997, 11(2): 199-212.
  • 9汤国安,陈楠,刘咏梅,张友顺,陈正江.黄土丘陵沟壑区1∶1万及1∶5万比例尺DEM地形信息容量对比[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(2):34-36. 被引量:33
  • 10Holmes K W, Chadwick O A, Kyriakidis P C. Error in a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 233(1-4): 154-173.

二级参考文献12

共引文献125

同被引文献2024

引证文献178

二级引证文献1580

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部