摘要
“松月案”被誉为是“2 0 0 3年中国十大案件之一”,对它所作出的判决备受国人的瞩目。该案的一审判决书一方面体现了人民法院对被诉具体行政行为的法律特征的准确认定 ,但另一方面又暴露了其对法律法规的错误适用、判决结果的措辞不准确等一些不足之处。对这些问题的思考与分析 ,将有利于我们更好地改进今后的行政审判工作。
Song Yue Case' was called 'one of the top ten cases in 2003 in China', and its sentence was focused on by fellow countrymen. On the one hand, the written judgment by the first trial gave expression to the accurate identification to the legal character of the accused concrete administrative act by the court, on the other hand, it had disclosed the weakness of wrongly applying the laws, and the shortage of inaccurate diction on the sentence consequence. So it will be profitable to think these problems carefully for improving our administrative trial work in the future.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2005年第2期112-114,122,共4页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
基金
四川大学法学院中国司法改革研究中心资助课题"中国行政诉讼庭审制度改革研究"之成果
