期刊文献+

CAPS理论与人格心理学的整合 被引量:7

CAPS Theory and the Integration in Personality Psychology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 米契尔等人在认知情感人格系统理论中提出了认知情感单元,认为个体在单元的长 期可通达性和单元之间关系的结构上存在差异,这是个体独特性的基础。该理论假设,当个体在不 同时间,遇到不同情境时,人格系统会产生具有独特的正面图和情境—行为剖面图。这一理论重新 界定了人格系统、状态、特质与动力等概念,在一定程度上调和了人格心理学领域的矛盾,为人格心 理学提供了一种整合途径。 The cognitive-affective units was proposed in CAPS theory. Individuals differ in the chronic accessibility of the units and in the organization of the relationships of units. These differences are the basis of the individual characteristic. CAPS theory assumes that the personality system will produce if...then...situation-behavior profile with unique elevation and form when an individual faces a different situation at different time. CAPS theory reconceptualizes personality system, state, disposition and dynamics. It reconciles the conflicts in personality psychology to some degree and provides a way of integrating this field.
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期89-93,共5页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 CAPS理论 认知-情感单元 情境-行为剖面图 CAPS theory cognitive-affective units situation-behavioral profiles
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1LA珀文 周榕 陈红 等 译.人格科学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001..
  • 2Walter Mischel, Yuichi Shoda. Cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations , dispositions,dynamics, and the invariance in personality structure [ J ].Psychological Review, 1995,2:246 - 268.
  • 3Walter Mischel. Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality [ J ]. Psychological Review, 1973,4: 252 - 283.
  • 4Philip K. Peake, Walter Mischel. Getting lost in the search for large coefficients: Reply to Conly [ J ]. Psychological Review, 1984, 4:497-501.
  • 5Mischel W, Shoda Y. Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within a unified theory of personality: The Cognitive Affective Personality System (CAPS) [ A]. In L A Pervin, O.John (Eds.). Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research2e[C]. New York: Guilford, 1999. 197-218.
  • 6罗珊红.人格心理学的未来:等待“大一”[J].心理科学进展,1998,8(4):21-24. 被引量:9
  • 7于松梅,杨丽珠.米契尔认知情感的个性系统理论述评[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(2):197-201. 被引量:30

二级参考文献17

  • 1罗珊红.人格心理学的未来:等待“大一”[J].心理科学进展,1998,8(4):21-24. 被引量:9
  • 2[1]Pervin L A, John O P. Personality: Theory and research. Seventh edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1997. 401~403
  • 3[2]Mischel W, Shoda Y. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 1995, 102: 246~268
  • 4[3]Rosch E H. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104: 192~233
  • 5[4]Medin D L. Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 1989, 44: 1469~1481
  • 6[6]Canton N, Mischel W, Schwartz J. Social knowledge: Structure, content, use, and abuse. In: Isen A M, Hastorf A H. eds. Cognitive Social Psychology. New York: Elsevier North Holland, Inc, 1982. 33~72
  • 7[7]Mischel W. Instruction to Personality. Sixth edition. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1999. 417~423
  • 8[8]Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez M L. Delay of gratification in children. Science, 1989, May, 244: 933~938
  • 9[9]Mischel W, Shoda Y, Peake P K. The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54: 687~696
  • 10[10]Shoda Y, Mischel W, Peake P K. Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 1990, 26(6): 978~986

共引文献48

同被引文献107

引证文献7

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部