摘要
哈贝马斯的沟通行动理论旨在区分沟通理性和工具理性 ,而这一区分的关键在于能否有效地区分以言行事行为和以言取效行为 ,特别是能否证明以言行事行为独立于并且优先于以言取效行为。文章指出 ,哈贝马斯对这个根本问题的论证并不特别令人信服 ,在此意义上 ,哈贝马斯所构筑的沟通行动理论就存在根基不牢的危险。
The aim of Habermas’ theory of communicative action is to distinguish the communicative rationality from the instrumental rationality, which turns out to be the case only if it can be shown that the distinction between illocutionary acts and perlocutinary acts is clear, Moreover, illocutionary acts are not only one kind of independent acts but also more original than perlocutionary acts. In this paper, I will argue that the justification Habermas offers is not so convincing, therefore, there are many fundamental fallacies in Habermas’ theory of communicative action.
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第2期26-31,共6页
Seeking Truth
关键词
沟通行动
策略行动
以言行事行为
以言取效行为
有效性宣称
communicative action
strategic action
illocutionary acts
perlocutionary acts
validity claims
