期刊文献+

不同磷水平玉米自交系根系形态及吸收氮、钾差异研究 被引量:7

Differences of corn inbred lines in root morphology, nitrogen uptake and potassium uptake at different phosphorus levels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过盆栽试验研究4个自交系玉米在低磷和正常供磷两个磷水平下的磷效率差异、根系形态与磷效率的相关性及吸收氮、钾营养的差异。结果表明:在土培条件下,玉米的磷效率与吸磷量存在极显著正相关关系,根体积、根半径与磷效率的相关性均呈显著正相关,说明在缺磷条件下吸收效率高的基因型磷效率较高,且有较大根体积和根半径。同时,缺磷也导致玉米对氮、钾吸收的降低。 A pot experiment was conducted to study the differences in phosphorus efficiency, root morphology and nitrogen and potassium uptakes, and the correlativity between root morphology and phosphorus efficiency in four corn inbred lines at low and normal phosphorus levels. The results demonstrated that with hilling done, phosphorus efficiency showed a significant and positive correlation with the amount of absorbed phosphorus in corn and this indicated that the genotypes with high uptake efficiency had high phosphorus uptake efficiency under phosphorus deficiency as well as big root size and radiuses. Meantime, phosphorus deficiency also led to lowered uptakes of nitrogen and phosphorus.
作者 张静 王艳
出处 《干旱地区农业研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期88-90,共3页 Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas
基金 山西省科技攻关项目(033005)
关键词 磷效率 磷水平 根系形态 玉米自交系 根体积 缺磷 吸收 差异 条件 正相关 corn phosphorus efficiency root morphology
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1徐茂,曹翠玉,史瑞和.不同作物对磷的吸收与根系的生理形态特征的关系[J].南京农业大学学报,1991,14(4):65-70. 被引量:20
  • 2曹爱琴,严小龙.不同供磷条件下大豆根构型的适应性变化[J].华南农业大学学报,2001,22(1):92-92. 被引量:31
  • 3张福锁 林翠兰.植物磷营养基因型差异的机理[A]..土壤与植物营养研究新动态(第一卷)[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1992.23-30.
  • 4Gerloff G C, Gabelman W H. Genetic basis of inorganic plant nutrition[A]. Lauchli A, Bieleski RL. Encyclopediao of Plant Physiology[C]. Berlin: Springer-verlag, 1983.453-480.
  • 5史瑞和.土壤农化分析(第二版)[M].北京:农业出版社,1986..
  • 6严小龙,廖红,杨茂.根构型分析在豆科作物磷效率研究中的应用[J].中国农业科技导报,1999,1(1):40-43. 被引量:20
  • 7王应祥,廖红,严小龙.大豆适应低磷胁迫的机理初探[J].大豆科学,2003,22(3):208-212. 被引量:48
  • 8Liao H,Rubio G, Yan X, et al. Gravitropic response of bean root system to phosphorus deficiency[A]. Lynch J P, Deikman J. Phosphorus in Plant Biology: Regulatory Roles in Molecular, Cellular, Organic and Ecosystem Processes[C]. Maryland: American Society of Plant Physiologists,1999.329-331.
  • 9Bonser A,Lynch J,Pand Snapp S.Effect of phosphorus deficiency on growth angle of basal roots in phaseolus rulgeri[J].New Phytol,1996,132:281-288.
  • 10Garcia M, Ascencio J.Root morphology and acid phosphorus activity in tomato plants during development and recovery from phosphorus stress[J]. J of Plant Nutr,1992,15(11):2491-2530.

二级参考文献21

  • 1严小龙.热带土壤中菜豆种质耐低磷特性的评价[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1995,1(1):30-37. 被引量:23
  • 2廖红,植物学报,2000年,42卷,2期,158页
  • 3张福锁 林翠兰.植物磷营养基因型差异的机理[A]..土壤与植物营养研究新动态(第一卷)[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1992.23-30.
  • 4Gerloff G C, Gabelman W H. Genetic basis of inorganic plant nutrition. In: Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology (Lauchli A and Bieleski R L, eds)[M]. Berlin: Springer-verlag, 1983,p453-480.
  • 5Bhat K S, Nye P H. Diffusion of phosphate to plant roots in soil I. Quantitative autoradiography of the depletion zone[J]. Plant and Soil, 1973,38:161-175.
  • 6Gerloff, G. C.Intact plant screening for tolerance of nutrient-deficiency stress[J]. Plant Soil, 1987,99:3-16.
  • 7Lynch J. The role of nutrient-efficient crops in modern agriculture[J]. Journal of Crop Production, 1998,1(2):241-264.
  • 8Stan D. Wullschleger,Jonathan P. Lynch,Glenn M Berntson.Modeling the belowground response of plants and soil biota to edaphic and climatic change—What can we expect to gain?[J]. Plant and Soil . 1994 (1)
  • 9Kai L. Nielsen,Jonathan P. Lynch,Andrei G. Jablokow,Peter S. Curtis.Carbon cost of root systems: an architectural approach[J]. Plant and Soil . 1994 (1)
  • 10William L. Bland,Mark A. Mesarch.Counting error in the line-intercept method of measuring root length[J]. Plant and Soil . 1990 (1)

共引文献103

同被引文献120

引证文献7

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部