期刊文献+

东南极拉斯曼丘陵友谊峰基岩^(10)Be暴露年龄及其地质意义 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 东南极沿海拉斯曼丘陵地区缺乏末次冰盛期(约20 ka)的冰碛物堆积,冰川擦痕的保存以及冰退后海岸线的卸载反弹也很不明显,因此该地区末次冰盛期是否覆盖巨厚冰川存在分歧. 已有的14C测年结果显示拉斯曼丘陵至少部分地区在末次冰盛期无冰,冰退初始时间约在44 ka前.利用原地生成宇宙成因核素10Be测定了拉斯曼丘陵地区米洛半岛友谊峰的基岩暴露年龄,结果表明友谊峰基岩的10Be最小暴露年龄约40 ka,考虑到基岩存在侵蚀实际暴露年龄可能要略早.友谊峰基岩10Be最小暴露年龄表明友谊峰末次冰退时间要明显早于末次冰盛期,约40 ka前友谊峰以北米洛半岛大部分地区已基本无冰.友谊峰东南约400 m的106峰峰顶漂砾的10Be暴露年龄为8.8 ka,表明冰盖边缘位置曾长时间位于友谊峰和106峰之间,冰川边缘从友谊峰退到106峰的过程历时30 ka以上.
出处 《自然科学进展》 北大核心 2005年第3期298-303,共6页
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向(KZCX2-SW-119)国家自然科学基金(批准号:40102020)资助项目
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1李栓科.东南极拉斯曼丘陵区斯托尼斯半岛地貌特征初论[J].南极研究,1993,5(1):16-23. 被引量:6
  • 2顾兆炎,刘东生,D.Lal.^(10)Be和^(26)Al在地表形成和演化研究中的应用[J].第四纪研究,1997,17(3):211-221. 被引量:39
  • 3徐锡伟 陈文彬 王峰.宇宙成因核素测年法及其在构造地貌学研究中的应用[A].陈文寄 计凤桔 王非主编.年轻地质体系的年代测定(续)[C].北京:地震出版社,1999.240-260.
  • 4仝来喜,刘小汉,张连生,陈海泓,任留东,王彦斌,赵越.东南极拉斯曼丘陵麻粒岩相岩石中早期残留矿物组合的特征及其变质作用条件[J].岩石学报,1997,13(2):127-138. 被引量:17
  • 5Burgess J S, Spate A P, Shevlin J. The onset of deglaciation in the Larsemann Hills, Eastern Antarctic. Antarctic Science,1994, 6(4): 491-495.
  • 6Hodgson D A, Noon P E, Vyverman W, et al. Were the Larsemann Hills ice-free through the Last Glacial Maximum? Antarc tic Science, 2001, 13(4): 440-454.
  • 7Gillieson D. An environmental history of two freshwater lakes in the Larsemann Hills, Antarctica. Hydrobiologia, 1991, 214:327-331.
  • 8Bennett M R, Glasser N F. Glacial Geology- Ice Sheet and landforms. 4th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1999,148-286.
  • 9Zwartz D, Bird M, Stone J, et al. Holocene sea-level change and ice-Sheet history in the Vestfold Hills, East Antarctica. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1998, 155:131-145.
  • 10Fabel D, Stone J, Fifield L K, et al. Deglaciation of the Vestfold Hills, East Antarctica: Preliminary evidence form exposure dating of three subglacial erratics. In: Ricci C A ed. The Antarctic Region: Geological Evolution and Processes. Siena: Terra Antarctica Publication, 1997, 829-834.

二级参考文献14

共引文献57

同被引文献84

  • 1Lal D.In Situ-procduced Cosmogenic Isotopes in Terrestrial Rocks[J].Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences,1988,16:355-388.
  • 2Lal D.Cosmic Ray Labeling of Erosion Surfaces:In Situ Nuclide Production Rates and Erosion Models[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,1991,104:424-439.
  • 3Brown E T,Edmond J M,Raisbeck G M,et al.Examination of Surface Exposure Ages of Antarcitc Moraines using In Situ Produced ^10Be and ^26Al[J].Beochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1991,55:2269 -2283.
  • 4Nishiizumi K,Winterer E L,Kohl C P,et al.Cosmic Ray Production Rates of ^10Be and ^26Al in Quartz from Glacially Polished Rocks[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1989c,94:17907-17915.
  • 5Gosse J C.Terrestrial In Situ Cosmogenic Nuclides:Theory and Application[J].Quaternary Science Reviews,2001,20:1475-1560.
  • 6Brook E J,Brown E T,Kurz M D,et al.Constraints on Age,Erosion,and Uplift of Noegene Glacial Deposits in the Transantarctic Mountins Determined from In Situ Cosmogenic ^10Be and ^26Al[J].Geology,1995,23:1063-1066.
  • 7Granger D E,Muzikar P F.Dating Sediment Burial with In Situ-produced Cosmogenic Nuclides:Theory,Techniques,and Limitations[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2001,188:269-281.
  • 8Leland J,Reid M R,Burbank D W,et al.Incision and Differential Bedrock Uplift along the Indus River near Nanga Parbat,Pakistan Himalaya,from ^10Be and ^26Al Exposure Age Dating of Bedrock Straths[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,1998,154:93-107.
  • 9Phillips W M.Estimating Cumulative Soil Accumulation Rates with In Situ-produced Cosmogenic Nuclide Depth Profiles[J].Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B,2000,172:817-821.
  • 10Small E E,Anderson R S,Hancock G S.Estimate of the Rate of Regolith Production using ^10Be and ^26Al from an Alpine Hillslope[J].Geomorphology,1999,27:131-150.

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部