期刊文献+

全球治理中的猎鹿困境 被引量:17

The"Stag Hunt" Game and It's Implication to Global Governance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 今天 ,全球治理的发展正面临着巨大的困难 :不仅包括已有着充分讨论的“白搭车”、相对收益等问题 ,还包括卢梭所论说的“猎鹿困境”。对全球治理而言 ,卢梭“猎鹿困境”暗示了在缺乏有约束力的中央权威下 ,集体协议遭到不受制裁的违背的极大可能 ,其伦理原因在于“自我保存伦理”与“自我超越伦理”的根本冲突。在走向全球治理的过程中 ,无论是高政治还是低政治领域都存在着严重的“猎鹿困境” ,个别国家对绝对安全的追求、恐怖主义、大规模杀伤性武器扩散、全球环境保护努力受挫等仅是冰山一角。因而 ,要超越“猎鹿困境”、实现真正的全球治理 ,伦理上需要确立自我超越伦理的首要地位 。 Nowadays, global governance is facing great challenges, not only including the problems that have been fully discussed such as free ride or relative gains, but also the 'stag hunt' fable that Rousseau has probed into. Rousseau's fable indicates that given international anarchy, there exists great possibility of violating collective agreements. The ethical reason lies in the fundamental conflict between the two types of ethics: self-preservation vs. self-overcoming. In the process of realizing global governance, there are so many examples of 'stag hunt' game. The pursuit of absolute security, state terrorism, the proliferation of WMD, and the frustration of global environmental protection, are only several notorious cases. To overcome the 'stag hunt' game and realize global governance, humanity must keep the ethics of self-overcoming as the first choice and transform hierarchical governance to governance by network.
作者 潘亚玲
出处 《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期55-61,共7页 International Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1潘亚玲,时殷弘.论霍布斯的国际关系哲学[J].欧洲研究,1999,20(6):13-21. 被引量:15
  • 2时殷弘,叶凤丽.现实主义·理性主义·革命主义─—国际关系思想传统及其当代典型表现[J].欧洲研究,1995,16(3):4-16. 被引量:44
  • 3迈克尔·沃尔泽.《论宽容》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年版.第2页,第19页.
  • 4沃尔泽.《论宽容》[M].,.第23页.
  • 5安东尼·吉登斯.《现代性的后果》[M].译林出版社,2000年版,第18—26页,第1页,第32—39页.
  • 6Markus Fischer, The Liberal Peace: Ethical, Historical,and Philosophical Aspects (Harvard: Belfer Centerfor Science and International Affairs, 2000), esp.section 4, "The Historical Aspect of the Liberal Peace".
  • 7时殷弘.《新趋势、新格局、新规范》,第三、四章.
  • 8George Modelski, Long Cycles in Worm Politics (Seattle: University of Washington, 1987), esp. chap. 4.
  • 9Micheal Doyle, "Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, 1 and 2," Philosophy and Public Afflairs, Vol. 12, Nos. 3 and 4 (Summer and Fall 1983).
  • 10Doyle. "Kant: Liberalism and World Politics," American Political Science Review,Vol.80, No. 4 (December 1986), pp. 1151-1169.

共引文献84

同被引文献322

引证文献17

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部