摘要
国际法学界对“国际人道法”的定义存在着不同的理解 ,但其法律概念和特征都应当是一致的。狭义的国际人道法学说 ,片面地强调国际人道法与战争法的区别 ,并将它作为单独的法律体系 ;而广义的国际人道法学说 ,则把国际人道法与战争法融为一体 ;两种学说都有理论缺陷。国际人道法是战争法的一个组成部分 ,其与战争法的关系 ,既有联系又有区别 。
There exist different understandings about the concept of International Humanitarian Law, in the field of international law society. Some people hold the narrow perception of the concept which focuses on the distinction between the Law of International Humanitarian and the Law of War with excessive importance. On the other hand, some people hold that the concept should be understood in broad sense, and the Law of International Humanitarian and the Law of War should be integrated into one body. Both theories have some defects. Different expressions of International Humanitarian Law should never diversify the concept itself. International Humanitarian Law is just a part of the Law of War. These two concepts are closely related with some differences present.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第2期141-146,共6页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词
国际人道法
定义
战争法
法律概念
法律体系
理论缺陷
组成部分
辩证统一
法学界
学说
作为
International Humanitarian Law
International Humanitarian Law in Narrow Sense
International Humanitarian Law in Broad Sense
Law of War
