摘要
查特吉的《历史与民族》通过对达里尼查仁等人的民族历史叙述的考察,揭示了后殖民理论的尴尬处境———试图摆脱殖民叙事,却抹杀了被殖民国家内部的多样性;试图彰显单一民族的历史,却无视民族国家内部宗教与民族多元的现实,在民族内部与外部、自性与他性、自我与他者之间陷入了后殖民历史叙事的圈套。
In the inspection and retrospection of the national history written by the scholars like Tarinicharan, History and Nation , by Chatterjee, discusses the theoretical dilemma of post-colonialism: While attempting to break away from colonialist narrative and highlighting the unitary history of the same clan, it obliterates the instinctive diversities of the colonized nation-state and ignores the reality of diverse religious and ethnic communities in the same nation-state. As a result, the post-colonialism creates the post-colonialist historical narrative between national interiority and exteriority, identity and exclusiveness, selves and others,thus falls into the cultural trap of the post-colonialist history.
出处
《世界民族》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第2期71-78,共8页
Journal of World Peoples Studies
