期刊文献+

文学研究:终结还是再生?——米勒文学研究“终结论”解读 被引量:23

Literary researches:finality or rebirth? - interpretation of Miller's literary researches "on Finality"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 米勒根据电子化和全球化时代文学形态的变化和文化研究转向的事实,提出和阐发了文学研究“终结论”,但另一方面又相信传统的文学研究仍有意义并将继续存在,这是一个充满深刻矛盾和张力的悖论式命题。通过对这一理论命题的解读,我们可以领悟到:文学及其文学研究是否走向终结,未必由某些现实条件(如电信技术)所决定,重要的是有对文学与人的生存之永恒依存关系的深刻理解,有建立在这一基础之上的坚定信念,以及与时俱进、顺时变通的开放性态度。这样就有可能使文学和文学研究绝处逢生,获得新的生机和开辟新的前景。 According to the facts of the changes of the literary morphology and turning of the cultural researches Miller advances and explains 'Viewpoints of Finality of literary researches, on the other hand he believes in that the literary researches are of significance as well, they would continuously exist, and it is a paradoxical proposition full of profound contradictive tension. Through the explanation of this theoretical proposition we realize : literature and literary researches are approaching the finality or not, those are not decided by some actual conditions ( such as telecom technique), it is important to profoundly comprehend the forever depend relation of human being, there should be firm faith to be built on this basis, it should grow with each passing time and comply with the open attitude of versatility. In this way it is possible to make literature and literary researches to be unexpected rescued from a desperate situation,to get new vital force and to open up a new foreground.
作者 赖大仁
出处 《学习与探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期102-108,共7页 Study & Exploration
关键词 文学研究 终结论 转向论 阅读理论 literary researches viewpoint of finality viewpoint of turning theory of reading
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献47

  • 1J·希利斯·米勒,国荣.全球化时代文学研究还会继续存在吗?[J].文学评论,2001(1):131-139. 被引量:520
  • 2Mark Edmundson, Lhemture against Philosophy, Plato to Derrida : A Defence of Poetry, Cambridge University Press, 1996, p. 1.
  • 3Jacques Derrida, The Post Card, From Socates to Freud and Beyond, trans. Alan Bass, Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987, p, 197.p.204, P. 191, P,28, P,27, P.29, P,30-31,P.62, P.171, P,X iii , P. 102, P.73, P.44,P.45, P. 177, P.327, P.392.
  • 4Arthur Schopenhauer, Der handschrifiliche Ntwhlass hrsg. von Arthur Huebscher, Muenchen1985, Bandl S.19.
  • 5Wolfgang lser, The Fictive and the Imaginary, Charting IJterary Anthropology, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993, "Preface," p.xvi. P.296. PP,298 - 299.
  • 6V.Shklovsky, "Art as Tetchnlque," in: Russian Formalist Criticism, Four Essays, Lincoln: The University of NebraskaPress, 1965, p, 12.
  • 7"Kunst and Nachahmung," (1967) in: Asthetik and Poetik 1, Geosammelte Werke, Bd. 8, Tuebingen: J.C.B.Mohr (Paul Sieheck) .1999.S.32.
  • 8Alan Bass, "Translator's Introduction: 1, before K," p.X ii , in: Jacques Denida, The Post Card, From Socrates to Freud and Beyond.
  • 9Zeit and Sein," in: Martin Heidegger,Zur Sanche des Denkens, 3. auf, Tuebingen: Niemeyer 1988, S.8-9.
  • 10Jaques Derrida, "le fateur de la retire," first published in Poetique 21 (1975), and now included in: Jacques. Derrida, The Post Card, From Socrates to Freud and Beyond, p.444.pp. 123 - 124.

共引文献589

同被引文献219

引证文献23

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部