摘要
目前,针对农民工的各种法律和政策保护越来越完善,但与此同时,农民工,尤其是伤残农民工的处境却依然不利。本文认为造成伤残农民工权益保护制度悖论的原因在于伤残农民工的维权道路上存在着一个与赋权完全相反的剥权的过程。剥权主要表现为制度运作实践中形成的制度连接机制。本文主要分析了资本和地方权力体系在制度运作实践中形成的去合法性、增大维权成本、对制度的选择性利用和弱化社会支持四种制度连接机制。
At present, various kinds of legal protections and policy systems for migrant workers are more and more perfect, but migrant workers, especially injured migrant workers are still miserable. By focusing on the process of safeguarding the rights of injured migrant workers this paper has discovered that there is another process that is completely opposite to the empowerment in practice. There is a process of de-powerment. De-powerment refers to the fact that although the empowered group claimed on their rights nominally, they get caught into a completely opposite process of legalized deprivation in the practical process of struggling for their own rights and interests. The concept of legalized deprivation takes on the forms of institutional interlink in the operation of institutional practice. The present research has analyzed four types of institutional interlinks, which are found in the operating process, including delegitimation, increase of the cost of safeguarding rights, the alternative usage of institutions and the weakening of social support.
出处
《社会学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第3期99-118,244,共21页
Sociological Studies
