摘要
违约(包括故意)以及欺诈行为,仍然属于民事法律调整的范畴,合同诈骗则属于刑事法律调整的犯罪行为,二者之间以是否存在一个真实或基本真实的交易为分水岭;交易条件是否真实、透明,不但影响对案件性质的认定,也决定其民事争议的最终处理;交付之后的行为被认作诈骗行为表现的,必须特别慎重;而对于行为人是否具有“以非法占有为目的”的主观要件,应坚持审查其是否具有“将他人财物永久性地归自己完全享用”的主观内容。
The paper discusses some vital points to consider in defining and identifying crime of contract fraud, breach of contract, together with act of false pretense. The latter still falls into the category of civil wrongs while the former is a kind of crimes to be regulated by criminal law. The watershed of the two acts lies in whether there is a genuine transaction between the two parties. The fact that whether the conditions of the transaction are genuine and transparent not only influences the cognizance of such cases but also final civil decision. Special attention should be paid to the act that is deemed to be the crime of contract fraud after the transaction. As to the subjective element of “with the purpose of illegal possession”, it should be made clear whether or not the doer aims at permanent and total possession of the property.
出处
《海南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2005年第2期202-206,共5页
Journal of Hainan University （Humanities & Social Sciences）
关键词
合同诈骗罪
犯罪构成
欺诈
contract
crime of contract fraud
elements of crime
false pretense.
