期刊文献+

油气管道完整性维护决策的有限费用优化方法 被引量:3

OPTIMIZATION METHOD BASED ON FINITE CHARGE FOR OIL/GAS PIPELINE INTEGRI TY MAINTENANCE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 管道失效后果会引发财产损失、人身安全损失及环境破坏。有限费用优化是在人身安全和环境破坏的约束下,以“使管段总失效损失期望费用最小”为原则,通过求解优化数学模型,而获得最优维护方案。它可使维护方案在3类损失方面得到平衡和协调。文中提出了3种损失的货币化思想,认为财产损失可按传统的直接经济损失计算方法来确定;生命损失的货币度量要从人员死亡和伤残两部分来考虑,并给出了两部分损失的影响因素和确定原则;将环境破坏损失分为对人类健康影响的损失和对生态资源影响的损失,二者都需要根据国情和国家的法律法规来分析损失影响因素,并从环境因素、环境要素和影响因子3个角度,重点分析了造成生态资源破坏的因素体系,为环境破坏损失的货币化奠定了基础。最后,推荐了不同情况下的优化方法。 Pipeline failure will cause assets loss, life loss and environment destruction. The optimization method based on finite charge is to obtain the optimal maintenance program by solving the optimized mathematical model with the principle of 'making the expected charge of total pipeline failure loss minimal' under the conditions of life safety and environment protection. It makes the maintenance program able to balance and coordinate the above-mentioned 3 losses. The article proposes the idea to quantify the 3 losses by money. The assets loss can be determined by traditional calculating method of direct economic loss. The quantification of life loss can be conducted by the 2 parts of people dying and injuring. And the affecting factors and the confirming principle of the 2 parts are described. The environment destruction includes both the effects of people health and ecology resource. Both the losses will be analyzed according to the national situation, laws and regulations. From the 3 aspects of the environment factor, the environment element and the effecting, factor, the factor system to make the ecology resource destroying are analyzed in detail, which provides the ground for the quantification of environment destructiori by money. In the end, the optimization methods are recommended under different cases.
机构地区 西南石油学院
出处 《天然气工业》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第5期131-133,共3页 Natural Gas Industry
基金 石油科技中青年创新基金 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室开放基金(PLN0113) 四川省应用基础研究专项基金(01GY051-40)项目。~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1张鹏,段永红.长输管线风险技术的研究[J].天然气工业,1998,18(5):72-76. 被引量:35
  • 2陆朝荣.油库安全的费效分析[J].油气储运,1996,15(8):25-27. 被引量:2
  • 3Vinnem J E. "Risk Acceptance Criteria For Temporary Phases", 1994 OMAE-Volume Ⅱ, Safety and Reliability ASME 1994.
  • 4Reid S G,"Risk Acceptance for Novel Engineering Systems", 1992 OMAE-Volume Ⅱ, Safety and Reliability ASME 1992.
  • 5刘灵灵 罗云.事故非价值对损失的价值化技术[J].中国安全科学学报安全经济学专辑,1992,.
  • 6Bradley G , Fred C, Leverenz L. Contribution of Human Factors to Incidents in the Petroleum Refining Industry, Progress Safety Progress, Winter 1999;18(4).
  • 7Charles A W. Safety, Health, and Environmental Protection, WCB/McGraw-Hill, 1998.
  • 8陈利琼,张鹏,马剑林,王春兰.油气管道风险的模糊综合评价方法探讨[J].天然气工业,2003,23(2):117-118. 被引量:52

二级参考文献11

  • 1潘家华.油气管道的风险分析(续一)[J].油气储运,1995,14(4):1-7. 被引量:92
  • 2王彩华.模糊论方法学[M].中国建筑工业出版社,1988..
  • 3张鹏.压力容器和管道风险技术的价值和相互关系的展望[J].油气储运,1996,15(5).
  • 4张鹏.管道风险因素的模糊评价.模糊集理论及其应用[M].石家庄:河北大学出版社,1998..
  • 5刘育骥.石油工业模糊数学[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1994..
  • 6Muhlbauer W K. A proactive approach to pipeline risk assessment. Pipe Line Ind, 1992:75(7):37-39.
  • 7Muhlbauex W K. RIPS identifies pipeline risk. Pipe Line Ind, 1990,73(3):35-38.
  • 8Struff J E et al. progress towards an intelligent computer aided risk evaluation of pipeline designs. Pipelines Int, 1987,32(4):7-12.
  • 9Pyman M A F et al . Risk assessment of offshore pipelines and risers. Pipes Pipelines Int, 1988:32 (3):l7-23.
  • 10Keilty I D et al. Applying quantitative risk assessmeat to casing design:IADC.SPE 35038:IADC/SPE Drilling conf.New Orileans, 1996:101-111.

共引文献77

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部