摘要
目的 探讨联合应用热淋清、前列安栓、抗生素治疗慢性细菌性和慢性炎症性前列腺炎的疗效。方法 调查12 0例慢性细菌性和慢性炎症性前列腺炎患者,治疗组80例行三联疗法,对照组40例单用抗生素治疗,治疗12周前后,采用两杯判定试验(PPMT)结果和慢性前列腺炎症状指数评分(CPSI)的差异。结果 治疗组三联疗法中PPMT检查2 1例Ⅱ型患者有15例实验室检查转为正常,5 9例ⅢA型患者中41例实验室检查转为正常;CPSI评分判定:临床治愈11例(13 8% ) ,显效(CPSI减少>15 ) 48例(60 0 % ) ,有效(CPSI减少5～15 ) 16例(2 0 0 % ) ,无效CPSI减少<5为5例(6 3 % )。总有效率70 % ,对照组总有效率为3 5 % ,两组治疗效果比较,有显著性差异。结论 三联用药对慢性细菌性和炎症性前列腺炎比单用抗生素治疗具有更好的效果。
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of three-drug (Relingqing, Prostant and Antibiotic) therapy to chronic prostatitis. Methods One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: three-drug treatment group (n=80) and antibiotic only group (n=40). After treated for 12 weeks, 120 cases of chronic prostatitis were evaluated with the pre- and post-massage test (PPMT) and chronic prostatitis symptom index (CPSI). Results In three-drug treatment group, 15 patients in 21 patients of type Ⅱ and 41 patients in 59 patients of type ⅢA were normal evaluated by PPMT. From the results of CPSI, the cure rate was 13.8% (11 cases), the symptoms of 48 patients (60.0%) were improved significantly whose CPSI decreased more than 15, and only 16 patients(20.0%)felt a little better whose CPSI decreased from 5 to 15, and the symptoms of 5 patients were not improved. There was statistical difference among three-drug treatment group and antibiotic only group. Conclusion The three-drug treatment is more effective in treating chronic prostatitis than the therapy of antibiotic only.
出处
《第三军医大学学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第11期1156-1158,共3页
Journal of Third Military Medical University
关键词
三联用药
慢性前列腺炎
three-drug therapy
chronic prostatitis
