期刊文献+

临床肺感染评分诊断通气机相关肺炎 被引量:37

Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score Evaluation in Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价临床肺感染评分系统(CPIS)在通气机相关肺炎(VAP)诊断中的准确性。方法回顾性调查了解放军总医院在1986年7月~2004年6月间,机械通气>48h的80例老年尸检病例,分别用临床诊断标准和CPIS进行评价。结果80例患者发生34例VAP;临床诊断的敏感性67.6%、特异性58.7%、CPIS的敏感性76.5%、特异性67.4%。结论CPIS评分对本研究人群VAP的诊断价值优于临床诊断标准。 OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) in the (diagnosis) of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS To investigate retrospectively 80 old autopsy (cases) who had ventilation more than 48 hours in General Hospital of PLA from Jul 1986 to Jun 2004. Clinical (criteria) and CPIS were measured at the onset of VAP. RESULTS Thirty four of 80 patients developed VAP. (Clinical) diagnosis for VAP had a sensitivity of 67.6% and a specificity of 58.7%, CPIS at a threshold of (6 achieved) a sensitivity of 76.5% and a specificity of 67.4%. CONCLUSIONS In our study population, the use of CPIS is better than clinical criteria in the diagnosis of VAP.
作者 姜辉 俞森洋
机构地区 解放军总医院
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第7期751-752,共2页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 临床肺感染评分 通气机相关肺炎 尸检 Clinical pulmonary infection score Ventilator-associated pneumonia Autopsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Anon. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia by bacteriologic analysis of bronchoscopic and nonbronchoscopic "blind" bronchoalveolar lavage fluid[J]. Am Rev Respir Dis,1991, 143:1121-1129.
  • 2Papazian L, Thomas P, Garbe L, et al. Bronchoscopic or blind sampling techniques for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1995,152:1982-1991.
  • 3Luna CM, Blanzaco D, Niederman MS, et al. Resolution of ventilator-associated pneumonia: prospective evaluation of the clinical pulmonary infection score as an early clinical predictor of outcome[J]. Crit Care Med, 2003, 31:676-682.

同被引文献275

引证文献37

二级引证文献507

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部