期刊文献+

解郁丸及其拆方对抑郁模型小鼠的抗抑郁作用:差异比较 被引量:19

Difference of the antidepressant effects between Jieyu wan and its components in mouse models of depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究解郁丸及其拆方对抑郁模型小鼠的抗抑郁作用及其差异比较。方法:实验在北京大学医学部基础医学院药理系神经精神药理实验室进行。实验采用ICR雄性小鼠,体质量18~25g,随机分成8组:对照组(5g/L羧甲基纤维素钠)、氟西汀组(20mg/kg)、解郁丸低剂量组(65.75mg/kg)、解郁丸中剂量组(131.5mg/kg)、解郁丸高剂量组(263mg/kg)、逍遥散组(52.34mg/kg)、郁百合方组(14mg/kg)、甘麦大枣方组(21.6mg/kg)。采用小鼠强迫游泳实验、悬尾实验两个行为绝望实验观察解郁丸及其拆方的抗抑郁作用,为了鉴别上述各药是否具有中枢兴奋性的作用,又同时测定小鼠的自主活动,以确定解郁丸等抗抑郁药的可靠性。结果:强迫游泳实验、悬尾实验显示氟西汀组及解郁丸中、高剂量组、郁百合方、逍遥散、甘麦大枣方各组均可显著缩短小鼠不动时间(P<0.01)。解郁丸中、高剂量组、郁百合方、逍遥散、甘麦大枣方各组与氟西汀组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。解郁丸中、高剂量组与郁百合方、逍遥散、甘麦大枣方各拆方组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。小鼠的自主活动显示解郁丸低、中、高剂量组和郁百合方、逍遥散、甘麦大枣方各拆方组对小鼠自主活动均无显著影响(P>0.05)。结论:解郁丸及其拆方各组均可以改善小鼠抑郁状态行为,具有抗抑郁作用,且无? AIM:To compare the difference of the antidepressant effect between Jieyuwan an d its components on depressive mouse models. METHODS: The experiment was carried out in the pharmacological laboratory for neurology and psychology of the Department of Pharmacology,School of Basic Medic al Sciences,Peking University Health Science Center.Male ICR mice were randomly divided into 8 groups:control group(5 g/L carboxymethylcellulose sodium),fluoxet ine group (20 mg/kg),Jieyuwan small,middle and large dose groups (65.75,131.5 an d 263 mg/kg),Xiaoyaosan group (52.34 mg/kg),Yubaihe Fang group(14 mg/kg) and Gan mai Dazao Fang group(21.6 mg/kg).The antidepressant effects of Jieyuwan and its components were observed with two behavioral despair experiments of mice forced swimming test and mice tail suspension test.In order to identify whether the abo ve mentioned drugs had the role in central excitability,the automatic activitie s of the mice were determined to make sure the reliability of Jieyuwan and other antidepressants. RESULTS:The forced swimming test and tail suspension test showed that the immo bility time of rats was significantly shortened in the fluoxetine group,Jieyuwan middle and large dose groups,Yubaihe Fang group, Xiaoyaosan group and Ganmai Da zao Fang group(P< 0.01).Compared with the fluoxetine group, there was on obvious difference in the Jieyuwan middle and large dose groups,Yubaihe Fang group,Xiao yaosan group and Ganmai Dazao Fang group(P >0.05).The immobility times in the Ji eyuwan middle and large dose groups were not obviously different from those in t he Yubaihe Fang group,Xiaoyaosan group and Ganmai Dazao Fang group(P >0.05).The automatic activities of the mice showed that their automatic activities were not notably affected by small,middle and large dose Jieyuwan,Yubaihe Fang, Xiaoyaos an and Ganmai Dazao Fang(P >0.05). CONCLUSION:Jieyuwan and its components can ameliorate the depressive behaviors of mice.It has the antidepressant effect but has no effect of central excitabil ity.The antidepressant effect of Jieyuwan is not different from those of its components.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第16期115-117,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1沈振明,朱美兰,赵安全,于振剑,王丽萍,姜涛,韩毳,权长庚,于江,洪永波,罗和春.中药解郁丸与麦普替林治疗抑郁症的疗效对照观察[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2004,24(5):415-417. 被引量:29
  • 2Irwin S. Comprehensive observational assessment: Ia. A systematic, quantitative procedure for assessing the behavioral and physiologic state of the mouse. Psychopharmacologia 1968; 13(3): 222-57.
  • 3Porsolt RD, Bertin A, Jalfre M. Behavioral despair in mice: a primary screening test for antidepressants. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1977; 229 (2):327- 36.
  • 4Steru L, Chermat R, Thierry B, et al. The tail suspension test: a new method for screening antidepressants in mice. Psychopharmacology(Berl) 1985; 85(3):367-70.
  • 5Moryl E, Danysz W, Quack G. Potential antidepressive properties of amantadine,memantine and bifemelane. Pharmacol Toxicol 1993; 72(6): 394-7.
  • 6Puech A J, Chermat R, Poncelet M, et al. Antagonism of hypothermia and behavioral response to apomorphine: a simple, rapid and discriminating test for screening antidepressants and neuroleptics. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1981; 75 (1):84 -91.
  • 7Goodwin GM, Green AR, Johnson P. 5-HT2 receptor characteristics in frontal cortex and 5-HT2 receptor-mediated head-twitch behaviour following antidepressant treatment to mice. Br J Pharmacol 1984; 83(1): 235 -42.
  • 8严明.抗抑郁药氟西汀的临床应用[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(21):4348-4349. 被引量:4
  • 9许俭兴,谭杰文,区丽明.氟西汀和阿米替林治疗抑郁和焦虑障碍共病的疗效比较[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(15):2812-2814. 被引量:4

二级参考文献18

  • 1[2]Elkin I,Shea MT,Watkins JT,et al.Nutional institute of mental health teatment of depression CoUaborative research progam:General effeetiveness of treatments.Aroh Gen Psychiatry 2002;46:971-83
  • 2[4]Fontaine K,Chouinard G Fluoxitine in the lon-term maintenance treatment of obsesive compulsive disorder.Bychiatric Ammals 2002;19:88-91
  • 3[5]Mantogomerg SA.The efficacy of fluoxetine as an antidepressant in the short and long term.Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2003;4:113-9
  • 4[6]Hamilton M.The clinicad distinction between anxiety and depression.Br J Clin Pharmalol 2002;15:1665-99
  • 5[8]Fisch C.Effect of fluoxetine on the electrocardiogram.J Clin Psychiatry 2001;46:42-4
  • 6[9]Montgomery SA,Dufour H,Brion S,et al.The Prophylactic erricacy of fluoxetine in unipolar depresaion.Br J Psychiatry 2003;153:69-76
  • 7[10]Sohweizer E,Rickels KA,msterdam JD,et al.What constitutes and adequate antideprassant trial for fluoxetine? J Clin Psychiatry 1990;51:8-11
  • 8[11]Cooper Gl.The safefy of fluoxetine-an update.Br J Psychiatry 2003;153:77-86
  • 9American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Munal of Mental (DSM-N). 4th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association 1994:143
  • 10Jane F, Gumnick MD, Charles B, et al, Ph, D Aplication of antidepression drags. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61 (S10): 5

共引文献32

同被引文献244

引证文献19

二级引证文献241

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部