摘要
目的探讨超声子宫输卵管声学造影与X-线子宫输卵管造影(HSG)在诊断输卵管性不孕的诊断价值。方法通过对120例女性不孕患者行声学造影与HSG检查作对照分析。结果输卵管通畅组及阻塞组符合率100%,通而不畅组符合率66.91%,总符合率91.67%,差异无显著性(P<0.05)。结论声学造影操作简单,安全无创伤,与HSG比较对医患无害、无栓塞、无术后感染及药物过敏等副作用,但要确定输卵管阻塞的部位,尚需进一步进行HSG检查。
Objective To discuss the diagnostic val ue of ultrasonography in tubal dysgenesia,compared with hysterosalpingography(HS G). Methods The characteristics of ultrasonogaphy and HSG in 120 cases of dysgenesia were analysed. Results Compared to HSG,the accordant rate of unobstructi ve and obstructive fallopian groups were both 100%; the accordant rate of partia l obstrutive fallopian group was 66.91%;the total accordant rate was 91.67%;th e difference between them was unremarkable(P<0.05). Conclusions Ultrasonography is a simple,noninvasive and s afe examination method.Compared to HSG,it would not bring some side effects,suc h as harm,embolism,infection and drug allergy etc.But if we want to know the si te of fallopian obstruction,HSG examination is necessary.
出处
《中国超声诊断杂志》
2005年第7期516-517,共2页
Chinese Journal of Ultrasound Diagnosis
