期刊文献+

语篇连贯的认知世界分析方法——体验哲学和认知语言学对语篇连贯性的解释 被引量:110

The Cognitive -World Analysis of Dis course Coherence——The Embodied Philosophy and CL Explanation of Discourse Coherence
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于Lakoff提出的体验哲学和ICM理论以及Langacker的动态分析方法,结合认知语言学在词、句分析层面所使用的基本认知方式(如体验、激活、突显、原型等),提出语篇连贯性的认知世界分析方法。认知世界指内化于人们心智中的各种知识,可分为ICM和背景知识。一个语篇所提供的信息能在我们的心智中形成一个统一的认知世界,交际者就可以认为这个语篇具有连贯性。从根本上说,认知世界源自于人们对现实世界的感知和认识。因此,归根结底,体验和认知决定语篇的连贯性,体验哲学对语篇连贯性分析同样具有解释力,这样就进一步完善了认知语言学期望为分析语言各层面建立统一模式的构思。 This paper puts forward the cognitive-world approach for the analysis of discourse coherence on the basis of Lakoff’s Embodied Philosophy and ICM, and dynamic method by Langacker, combined with the human basic cognitive strategies. The cognitive world refers to the various kinds of knowledge internalized in human mind, and it is of two kinds:ICM and background knowledge. If the informa tion in a discourse can form a unified cognitive world in the communicators’ mind, this discourse is considered to be coherent. The cognitive world, in the final analysis, originates from the perception and cognition of the real world, so the embodiment and cognition determine discourse coherence, and Embodied Philosophy is also powerful for its analysis. It will help perfect the establishment of a unified model for the analysis of all language levels in the Cognitive Lingui stics Enterprise.
作者 王寅
机构地区 四川外语学院
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第4期16-23,112,共9页 Foreign Language Research
基金 广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心的资助国家社科基金项目(OIEYY001)系列成果之一。
关键词 认知语言学 体验哲学 语篇连贯性 ICM cognitive linguistics Embodied Philosophy discoursec oherence ICM
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis[M]. CUP.
  • 2Cook, Guy. 1994. Discourse and Literature[M]. OUP.
  • 3Deane, P. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax[M]. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 4Emmott, C. 1999. Embodied in a Constructed World: Narrative Processing, Knowledge Representation, and Indirect Anaphora[ A]. In Hoek K. V., A. A. Kibrik & L. Noordman (eds.). Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics[ C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 5Enkvist, N. E. 1978. Coherence, Pseudo- coherence, and Non- coherence[A]. In ? stman J.- O.(ed.) Cohesion and Semantics. ? bo, Finland:? bo Akademi Foundation.
  • 6Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan. R. 1976. Cohesion in English[M]. London: Longman.
  • 7Hallidan, M. A. K. & Hasan. R. 1985. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language as a Social- semiotic Perspective[M].OUP.
  • 8Jackendoff, R. S. 1983. Semantics and Cognition[M]. Cambridge, MA. :MIT Press.
  • 9Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things:What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. 2000. Grammar and Conceptualization[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

二级参考文献34

共引文献279

同被引文献1077

引证文献110

二级引证文献355

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部