摘要
我国合同法在促进私法自治和合同自由方面取得了巨大的历史性进步,但是对民事法律行为的法律、行政法规强制性规定的控制论在司法实践中仍然成为民事活动的桎梏。法律、行政法规强制性规定对民事法律行为效力的影响应结合民事法律行为对世与对人的危害程度进行辩证分析,对强制性规定的解释应注意私法与公法的区别,并将其对民事法律行为效力的束缚减少到最小。借鉴国外和台湾立法司法经验,在法律禁令中开创私法活动空间,尊重民事主体的选择,追求私法自治与国家强制的和谐。
The Contract Law of China has achieved historical progress in promoting the principle of the self-government with private laws and the principle of contracting freedom, but the compulsory standardization of the laws for civil legal acts and administrative laws and regulations is still the shackle in the juristic practice, whose influence on the effects of civil legal acts should be dialectically analyzed according to the degree of damages of civil legal acts to the society and people, while attention should be paid to the differences of private laws and public laws when explaining the compulsory standardization and its negation to the effects of civil legal acts should be minimized. Using experience of foreign countries and Taiwan in legislation and jurisdiction, this paper proposes to seek space for private laws among legal prohibitions, to respect the choice of civil main bodies, and to pursue the harmony between the self-movement with private laws and the state compulsion.
出处
《重庆工学院学报》
2005年第6期54-62,共9页
Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology
关键词
私法自治
国家强制
法律强制性规定
无效民事法律行为
self-government with private law
state compulsion
legal compulsory standardization
invalid civil juristic act
