摘要
目的:了解侧卧位与仰卧位有创血压测量结果有否不同。方法:对30例有创血压监测的患者,选用右侧股动脉有创血压测压法,分别测量仰卧位、右侧卧位、左侧卧位的血压。结果:仰卧位时收缩压平均135.63mmHg±21.47mmHg,右侧卧位时收缩压平均133.67mmHg±26.18mmHg;与仰卧位时比较(P>0.05),差别无统计学意义;左侧卧位时收缩压平均123.33mmHg±26.67mmHg,与仰卧位时比较(P<0.05),差别有统计学意义。仰卧位时舒张压平均76.23mmHg±13.94mmHg,右侧卧位时舒张压平均76.16mmHg±13.04mmHg,与仰卧位时比较(P>0.05),差别无统计学意义;左侧卧位时舒张压平均65.80mmHg±12.89mmHg,与仰卧位时比较(P<0.01),差别有高度统计学意义。结论:选用右侧股动脉测量有创血压时,右侧卧位与仰卧位有创血压测量无明显变化,左侧卧位时有创血压测量结果显著低于仰卧位时有创血压的测量结果,收缩压平均低12.30mmHg,舒张压平均低10.43mmHg。
Objective:To investigate whether invasive boold pressure measurement of lateral position and supine position was different or not.Methods:Boold pressure measurement of supine position,right lateral position and left lateral position was measured in 30 patients,with invasive boold pressure monitoring by the femoral arteries of right under limbs.Results:The mean systolic pressure of supine position was 135.63±21.47 mmHg,that of right lateral position was 133.67±26.18 mmHg.There was no significant difference in the two groups,P>0.05.The mean systolic pressure of left lateral position was 123.33±26.67mmHg,which was significant difference with that of supine position,P<0.05.The mean diastolic pressure of supine position was 76.23±13.94mmHg,that of right lateral position was 76.16±13.04mmHg,There was no significant difference in the two groups,P>0.05.the mean diastolic pressure of left lateral position was 65.80±12.89mmHg,which was significant difference with that of supine position,P<0.01.Conclusion:When the right femoral arteries were used for invasive boold pressure monitoring of different positions,there was no significant difference between right lateral position and supine position.The mean systolic pressure of left lateral position was 12.30mmHg lower than that of supine,and the mean diastolic pressure was 10.43mmHg lower.
出处
《中国中医基础医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第7期F003-F004,共2页
JOURNAL OF BASIC CHINESE MEDICINE
关键词
血压
测量
股动脉
boold pressure
measurement
femoral artery
