2O' Sullivan CA, Ramzy IS, Duncan A, et al. The effect of the Q-wave infarct on left ventricular electromechanical function. Intern J Cardiol,2003, 92: 71-76.
3Yang H, Pu M, Rodriguez D, et al. Ischemic and viable myocardium in patients with non-Q-wave or Q-wave myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction: a clinical study using positron emission tomography,echocardiography, and electrocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004,43: 592-598.
4Vijay SC, Anthony SL. Dynamic changes of QT interval and QT dispersion in non-Q-wave and Q-wave myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol,2001, 34: 109-117.
5Berman DS, Hayes SW, Shaw LJ, et al. Recent advances in myocardial perfusion imaging. Curr Probl Cardiol, 2001, 26: 94-100.
6Maruyama A, Hasegawa S, Paul AK, et al. Myocardial viability assessment with gated SPECT 99Tcm-tetrofosmin % wall thickening: comparison with 18 F-FDG PET. Ann Nucl Med, 2002, 16: 25-32.
7Matsunari I, Kanayama S, Yoneyama T, et al. Myocardial distribution of 18F-FDG and 99Tcm-sestamibi on dual-isotope simultaneous acquisition SPET compared with PET. Eur J Nucl Med, 2002, 29: 1357-1364.
8Kambara H, Nohara R, Tamaki N, et al. Positron emission tomography,usefulness in assessing myocardial viability. Jpn Circ J, 1992, 56: 608-613.
9Hashimoto T, Kambara H, Fudo T, et al. Non-Q-wave versus Q-wave myocardial infarction: regional myocardial metabolism and blood flow assessed by positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988, 12:88-93.
10Ben Ameur Y, Ben Cheikh I, Baraket F. Non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: study of 31 cases. Tunis Med, 2004, 82: 29-36.
