期刊文献+

建立中国的公共高等教育支出绩效与责任体系 被引量:8

Establishing Public Higher Education Expenditures Accountability and Performance System of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着中国高等教育规模的不断扩大,公共高等教育支出的数额也越来越大,公共高等教育支出的绩效成为政府和社会各界普遍关心的问题。建立公共高等教育支出绩效与责任体系是满足各方要求,提高公共高等教育支出绩效的有效手段。本文通过分析比较公共教育支出绩效与责任体系实现的三种形式,认为中国建立公共高等教育支出绩效与责任体系应该采用由“绩效基金+绩效报告”发展到“绩效基金+绩效预算+绩效报告”的发展思路。 With the growing development of higher education, public higher education expenditures become larger and larger. Government and publics are paying more attention to the performance of public higher education expenditures. Establishing public higher education expenditures accountability and performance system is effective approach to extend performance and to meet the needs of government and publics. Through analysis and compare of three forms of accountability and performance system, this article gives a suggestion that China should establish a system of “Performance Funding + Performance Reporting” firstly, and establish a system of “Performance Funding + Performance Budgeting + Performance Reporting” later.
作者 周炜
出处 《中央财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第8期12-16,共5页 Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
关键词 绩效与责任体系 绩效基金 绩效预算 绩效报告 Accountability and performance system Performance funding Performance budgeting Performance reporting
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1谌启标,柳国辉.美国高等教育绩效评价政策述评[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2004,26(3):26-29. 被引量:25
  • 2Ethel R. Detch, Connie Hardin, Bill Bradley, Measuring Performance in Higher Education [R], Office of Research Comptroller of the Treasury, Office of Legislative Budget Analysis Tennessee General Assembly, Division of Budget Department of Finance and Administration, 2001.
  • 3Joseph C. Burke, Accountability, Reporting, and Performance= Why Haven't They Made More Difference.9 [R], Keynote Address,39th Annual Conference, Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges, 2001.
  • 4Jung-cheol Shin, Sande Milton, The Effects of Performance Budgeting and Funding Programs on Graduation Rate in Public Four-Year Colleges and Universities [J], EPAA Vol. 12 No. 22, 2004.
  • 5The Florida Board of Governors, State University System of Florida: Performance Funding [R], 2004.
  • 6The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, Measuring Up 2004 [R], 2004.

二级参考文献8

  • 1[1]Neave G. The Evaluative State Reconsidered[J]. European Journal of Education. 1998,(3):265-85.
  • 2[2]Brennan J. Evaluation of Higher Education in Europe[M]. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.1999.219-35.
  • 3[3]Power M. Making Things Auditable[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1997,(23):289-315.
  • 4[4]Maassen P A M. Quality in European Higher Education: Recent Trends and their Historical Roots[J]. European Journal of Education. 1997,(2):111- 25.
  • 5[5]Neave G. The Evaluative State Reconsidered[J]. European Journal of Education.1998, (3):265-85.
  • 6[6]NASBO. State Innovations in Higher Education Finance and Governance[M]. National Association of State Budget Officers Information Brief. Washington, DC: NASBO.1996.
  • 7[7]SHEEO. Focus on Performance Measures[EB/OL]. http://www.sheeo.org/network/nn-feb98.htm.
  • 8[8]Ruppert, Sandra Survey Results of State Political and Higher Education Leaders[EB/OL].http://www1.umn.edu/mhec/summit/issues.htm.

共引文献24

同被引文献41

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部