摘要
在人类思想发展的历史上,亚里士多德最早是在与私人交往相区别的意义上使用了公民交往的概念。在20世纪的哲学家中,哈贝马斯深入洞察了发生于近代劳动与交换领域的交往又与之相互疏离的市民的公共领域。这种交往可以被概括为公共交往,并在理论的思考上区别于私人交往。公共交往与私人交往的相互疏离,是近代以来的社会历史发展的结果。私人交往关系在基本性质上是特殊主义的,人们用于支持朋友和伙伴间的友爱的基础也是共同交往所产生的感情关系。在公共生活中,交往关系是“普遍主义的”,这种关系上的相互有效性要求所诉诸的是人们对陌生人或“一般人”的法律的相互关系,以及基于这种关系的尊重与平等相待的态度。
Aristotle is the first one in human ideological history who uses the notion of civil intercourse as a counterpart against familial intercourse. But of the philosophers in the 20th century, Herbamas＇ discussion has developed the insights about the citizens＇ public sphere that has resulted from private sphere of labor and exchange and hence become alienated from that sphere. This sort of intercourse can be formulated as public intercourse and regarded as theoretically different from private intercourse. Its alienation from the latter is an outcome of the development of social history over the modern era. Relationship of private intercourse is essentially particularistic, with the ground of friendship between friends and companions as emotion relations out of certain common life. As a contrast, public intercourse relationship is universalistic, the mutual validity of which between individuals appeals to mutual legal relations, as well as to mutual attitudes of respect and treatment,with strangers or ordinary people.
出处
《北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第4期74-79,共6页
Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词
交往
私人生活
交往关系
私人交往
公共交往
intercourse
private life
relationship of intercourse
private intercourse
public intercourse
