期刊文献+

长江三角洲大都市区划分研究——兼论中美大都市区界定指标体系的比较 被引量:10

STUDY ON DEFINING THE METROPOLITAN AREAS OF YANGTZE RIVER DELTA ——Comparison between Standards for Defining Metropolitan Areas in China and Those in America
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文运用中国大都市区界定指标体系,根据2002年数据对长江三角洲大都市区进行了重新划分。从划分的结果看,后者与前者相比发生较大变化。而中国大都市区界定指标体系对这种变化表现出了一定的不适应性,因此本文试图通过中美大都市区界定指标体系的比较研究为中国大都市区界定指标体系的修订提供参考。 In recent years, standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China have been studied and the Metropolitan Areas of Yangtze River Delta have been defined according to the data in 1995. With great changes taking place in the Yangtze River Delta, this paper is dedicated to use standards for defining Metropoliltan Areas in China to redefine the Metropolitan Areas of Yangtze River Delta according to the data in 2002, which shows big changes in three aspects -Center city, Outer county and Metropolitan Interlocking Region. Since standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China cannot adjust to these changes. Firstly, this paper introduces the development of standards for defming the metropolitan areas in America in the past one hundred years fi-om four aspects: functional integration, metropolitan feature, central core and geographical unit. Secondly, this paper compares the standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China with those in America. There are four main distinctions as follows: 1) The standards in China are lacking in the data of flow by comparison with those in America; 2) The number of Metropolitan features in China is smaller than that in America; 3) The minimum size of center core in China is larger than that in America; the center core is limited by the administrative rank ; the value of size of center core is hard to get; 4) The standards in China are short of the center county contrasting with those in America. Thirdly, this paper divides these distinctions into two groups: 1) The first group includes the smaller number, different types and the lower value of Metropolitan features, lacking in center county, the center core limited by the administrative rank, etc.; 2) The second group includes lacking in the data of flow, difficulty in getting the value of center core, larger size of center core and so on.Finally, in light of the distinctions between standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China and those in America, the paper is to give six main suggestions to these in China。
作者 罗海明 甄峰
出处 《人文地理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第4期9-14,共6页 Human Geography
基金 国家自然科学基金(40301014) 项目名称"信息化影响下的区域城市网络形成过程及机制研究:以长江三角洲为例"资助。
关键词 大都市区 界定指标体系 长江三角洲 Metropolitan Area standards for defining Yangtze River Delta
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1周一星,史育龙.建立中国城市的实体地域概念[J].地理学报,1995,50(4):289-301. 被引量:201
  • 2顾朝林.中国城市经济区划分的初步研究[J].地理学报,1991,1.
  • 3顾朝林,刘志红.济南城市经济影响区的划分[J].地理科学,1992,12(1):15-26. 被引量:60
  • 4孙胤社.大都市区的形成机制及其定界——以北京为例[J].地理学报,1992,47(6):552-560. 被引量:117
  • 5许学强 周一星 宁越敏.城市地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1996.36-55.
  • 6美国人口普查局.Federal Register Notices [EB/OL].http://www.census.gov/,2000. 51059-51077,56627-56644,70525-70561,82227-82238,.
  • 7Zhou Yixing. The Metropolitan Interlocking Region in China: A Preliminary Hypothesis [A]. N.Ginsburg, B.Koppel and T.G.McGee, The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia[C].U.S. : University of Hawaii Press. 1991.89-111.
  • 8陈田.中国城市经济影响区系统的初步分析[J].地理学报,1987,42(4):308-318.

二级参考文献17

  • 1团体著者,北京社会经济统计年鉴,1990年
  • 2匿名著者,经济学译丛,1987年,1期,73页
  • 3匿名著者,经济学季刊,1924年,39期
  • 4周一星,城市问题,1993年,1期,22页
  • 5团体著者,中国人口统计年鉴,1993年,275页
  • 6团体著者,全国分县市人口统计资料1992年度,1993年
  • 7周一星,人口与经济,1992年,1期,21页
  • 8吴传钧,经济地理,1991年,11卷,3期,1页
  • 9团体著者,中国城市统计年鉴,1991年
  • 10朱宝树,城市问题,1990年,6期,14页

共引文献479

同被引文献157

引证文献10

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部