公司治理、技术创新路径与产业专业化被引量：12

Corporate Governance,Evolutional Route of Technology Innovation and Industry Specialization

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文从企业技术创新基于公司治理框架的三维特性分析入手,指出公司治理机制通过影响企业技术知识的积累和技术创新的投入、利益分配、权力分享,从而对技术创新具有路径决定作用。并指出这种路径决定作用形成了一国产业技术优势的差异,因此有助于解释各国形成产业专业化的原因。本文最后还对我国的情况进行了适当分析。 This paper starts with analyzing three characteristics of technology innovation based on corporate governance. The mechanism of corporate governance affects the accumulation of know-how, the devotion and the droit in technology innovation in corporation. Accordingly,corporate governance plays the role of determinant in technology innovation＇s evolutional route. Then we indicate that the determinant role leads to the difference of national industrial technology, and it will help us to explain what＇s the reason that industry specialization come into being.Finally, we analyze corporate governance and technology innovation in China.

作者王昌林蒲勇健

机构地区重庆工商大学管理学院重庆大学经济与工商管理学院

出处《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 2005年第3期10-14,共5页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

关键词技术创新公司治理企业技术创新特性发展路径产业专业化 technology innovation corporate governance corporation characteristic of technology innovation evolutional route industry specialization

分类号 F273.1 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1李维安.公司治理[M].南开大学出版社,2000..
2邹薇.论竞争力的源泉:从外生比较优势到内生比较优势[J].武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2002,55(1):35-37. 被引量：30
3Lazonick W.,OSullivan M. Organization,finance and international competition[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,1996(1):1～36.
4Lazonick W.,OSullivan M. Governance of Innovation for Economic Development[R].Report to the European Commission within the Innovation Systems and European Integration project,1998,March.
5Mayer C. Corporate governance,competition and performance[J].OECD Economics Department Working Paper,Paris:OECD,1996,no.164.
6Soskice D. German technology policy,innovation and national industrial frameworks[J].Industry and Innovation,1997,4:75～96.
7Andrew Tylecote,Emmanuelle Conesa. Corporate governance,innovation systems and industrial performance[J].Industry and Innovation,1999,6:25～50.
8Francesca Visintin,Andrew Tylecote. Financial and corporate governance systems and technological change:the incompleteness of fit of the UK and Italy[EB].Sheffield University Management School Working Paper,April 2003,available on-line at:www.shef.ac.uk/uni/academic/N-Q/perc/corpgov.
9Abingdon,Andrew Tylecote,Yong Doo Cho,Wei Zhang. National technological styles explained in terms of stakeholding patterns,enfranchisement and cultural differences:Britain and Japan[J].Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,1998,10:423～435.
10Pavitt,K. Sectoral Patterns of Technical change:towards a taxonomy and a theory[J].Research Policy,1984,13:343～375.

二级参考文献13

1[1]S Cohen.Speaking freely[J].Foreign Affairs(July-Angust),1994,73(4).
2[2]P Krugman.Competitiveness:A Dangerous Obsession[J].Foreign Affairs( March-April),1994,73(2).
3[3]Asian Competitiveness Report 1999,Geneva,Switzerland[R].World Economic Forum,1999.
4[4]P Mauro.Corruption and Growth[J].Quartly Journal of Economics,1995,11 0.
5[5]World Bank. East Asian Miracle[M].New York:Oxford University Press,199 3.
6[6]Asian Development Bank.The Role of Law and Legal Institutions in Asia n Economic Development[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1999.
7[7]M Porter.Competition in Global Industries[M].Harvard Business School Press,1986.
8[8]M Porter.The Competitive Advantage of Nations[M].New York:The Free Pr ess,1990.
9[9]G Grossman. Imperfect Competition and International Trade[M].Cambridge ,Massachusetts: The MIT Press,1997.
10[10]P Romer. Endogenous Technological Change[J].Journal of Pol itical Economy, 1990,98(S71-S102).