期刊文献+

错患者β角的临床评价 被引量:3

An approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the β angle
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的推介一种新的准确评价上下颌骨矢状向关系的头影测量方法:β角。方法β角由A点、B点、髁状突中点三个骨性标志点构成,测量值反应上下颌骨在矢状方向的不调;样本选取137名患者,按照3 项标准分三组,分别反应三种错类型,并计算均数和标准差。结果安氏Ⅰ类错β值为36.42°±3.33,安氏Ⅱ类错的β值为26.88°±6.81,安氏Ⅲ类错的β值为45.36°±3.68;各组β值在性别上没有显著性差异。结论β角能反应上下颌骨的矢状关系,β值在33°-39°之间为安氏Ⅰ类错畸形,安氏Ⅱ类错β角较锐,安氏Ⅲ类错患者的β角较钝。 Objective The purpose of this study was to establish a new cephalometric measurement, named the β angle, to assess the sagittal jaw relationship with accuracy and reproducibility. Methods β angle was composed of 3 skeletal landmarks-point A, point B, and the apparent axis of the condyle-to measure an angle that indicates the severity and the type of skeletal dysplasia in the sagittal dimension. 137 pretreatment cephalometric radiographs of patients were selected on the basis of 3 criteria that indicate three skeletal pattern, divided into three groups.the mean and the SD for the β angle were calculated. Results The results showed that a patient with a β angle between 33° and 39° can be considered to have a Class Ⅰ skeletal pattern. A more acute β angle indicates a Class Ⅱ skeletal pattern, and a more obtuse β angle indicates a Class Ⅲ skeletal pattern. Conclusions 1.The β angle was developed as a diagnostic aid to evaluate the sagittal jaw relationship more consistently.2. Subjects with a β angle between 33° and 39° have a class Ⅰ skeletal pattern; a β angle less than 33° indicates a Class Ⅱ skeletal pattern, and a β angle greater than 39° indicates a Class Ⅲ skeletal pattem.3.There is no statistically significant difference between mean Beta angle values of males and females.
出处 《口腔材料器械杂志》 2005年第3期131-133,136,共4页 Chinese Journal of Dental Materials and Devices
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Moyers RE, Bookstein FL, Guire KE. The Concept of pattern in craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod, 1979,76:136-148.
  • 2Freeman RS. Adjusting A-N-B angles to reflect the effect of maxillary position. Angle Orthod, 1981,51;162-711.
  • 3Jacobson A. The 'Wits' appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod, 1975,67:125-138.
  • 4Hussels W, Nanda RS. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.Am J Orthod, 1984185:411-423.
  • 5Holdaway RA. Changes in relationship of points A and B during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod, 1956,42:176-193.
  • 6Taylor CM. Changes in the relationship of nasion, point A and point B, and the effect upon ANB. Am J Orthod, 1969,56:143-163.
  • 7Jarvinen S. An analysis of the variation of the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal. Am J Orthod, 1985,87:144-146.
  • 8Beatty EJ. A modified technique for evaluating apical base relationships. Am J Orthod, 1975,68:303-315.
  • 9Moore AW. Observations on facial growth and its clinical significance. Am J Orthod, 1959,45:399-423.
  • 10Enlow DH. A morphogenetic analysis of facial growth. Am J Orthod, 1966,52:283-299.

同被引文献30

  • 1傅真,梁宏,赵兰芳.Wits值与ANB角在评价颌骨矢状位置关系中的价值[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1995,11(4):159-161. 被引量:4
  • 2刘东旭,张磊,王春玲,张晓燕,郭泾.安氏Ⅱ类1分类错上下颌基骨前后关系诊断指标的可靠性评价[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2006,24(4):323-327. 被引量:11
  • 3张昀,李东,丁寅,束嫘,曹猛,王燕,杨磊,吴丹.下颌旋转对Beta角影响的分析[J].口腔医学研究,2006,22(5):541-543. 被引量:7
  • 4Del SM.Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2006;129(5):641-648.
  • 5Baik CY,Ververidou M.A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies:The Beta angle.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2004;126(1):100-105.
  • 6Jarvinen S.An analysis of the variation of the ANB angle:A statistical appraisal.Am J Orthod.1985;87(2):144-146.
  • 7Freeman RS.Adjusting ANB angles to reflect the effect of maxilla position.Angle Orthod.1981;51 (2):161-171.
  • 8Chang HP.Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1987;92(2):117-122.
  • 9Jacobson A.The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony.Am J Orthod.1975;67(2):125-138.
  • 10Kim YH.Anterposterior dysplasia indicator:An adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis.Am J Orthod.1978;73(6):619-633.

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部