期刊文献+

地塞米松对哮喘豚鼠气管平滑肌毒蕈碱受体mRNA的表达及肺泡灌洗液嗜酸性粒细胞浸润的影响 被引量:2

Effects of dexamethasone on the expression of muscarinic receptor mRNA in asthmatic guinea pig airway smooth muscle and eosinophil infiltration in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨地塞米松对哮喘豚鼠气管平滑肌毒蕈碱受体(MR)mRNA的表达及肺泡灌洗液(BALF)嗜酸性粒细胞(Eos)浸润的影响。方法30只健康豚鼠随机分为3组:正常对照组、哮喘组和地塞米松治疗组。后两组制作成哮喘豚鼠模型,再激发用药。测定BALF的细胞总数及细胞分类,观察肺组织的病理改变,进行气管平滑肌的M2R、M3RmRNART-PCR半定量分析。结果各组BALF的Eos计数,地塞米松治疗组(11.0±3.1)较正常组(2.8±3.0)和哮喘组(29.2±7.3)有显著差异(P<0.01)。地塞米松治疗组肺组织充血水肿明显,但Eos肺组织浸润较哮喘组有明显减少。气管平滑肌的MRmRNART-PCR半定量分析显示,地塞米松治疗组M2R(0.90±0.14)与正常组(0.50±0.16)及哮喘组(1.26±0.24)比较均有显著差异(P<0.01),地塞米松组M3R与哮喘组比较有显著差异(P<0.01),与正常组比较无显著差异;正常组与哮喘组比较,M2R和M3R均有显著差异(P<0.01)。结论哮喘豚鼠M2R表达增加,M3R表达减少;地塞米松治疗可以通过抑制Eos浸润等炎症反应,调节M2R及M3R表达,从而恢复M2R功能,达到治疗哮喘的目的。 Objective To investigate the effect ofdexamethasone on the expression ofmuscarinic receptor (MR) mRNA in smooth muscle and infiltration of eosinophils (Eos) in the airway of asthmatic guinea pigs. Methods Thirty healthy guinea pigs were randomized into 3 equal groups, the control group, asthmatic group and dexamethasone therapy group. Asthma was induced in the latter 2 groups with the asthma-inducing agents and received treatments as indicated. Bronchial alveolar lavage fluid(BALF) were collected subsequently from the guinea pigs for examining the total cell number and cell classification, and histopathologic examination of the lung tissue was performed. Semi-quantitative analysis with reverse transcriptionalpolymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed for M2 and M3 receptor mRNA in airway smooth muscle. Results Compared with the control and the asthmatic group, the number of Eos in the BALF of dexamethasone therapy group was significantly lower (P〈0.01). In Spite of the presence ofhyperemia and edema in the lung tissues of the dexamethasone therapy group, Eos infiltration was less severe than that in the asthmatic group. As found by RT-PCR, the quantity of M2 receptor mRNA in the airway smooth muscle of the dexamethasone therapy group was significantly higher than those in both the control and asthmatic groups (P〈0.01), and the quantity of M3 receptor mRNA in the airway smooth muscle of dexamethasone therapy group was significantly higher than that in the asthmatic group, but did not significantly differ from that in the control group. The quantities of M2 and M3 receptor mRNAs in the control group were both significantly higher than that in asthmatic group (P〈0.01). Conclusion The expression of M2 receptor is increased in antigenchallenged guinea pigs, and that of M3 receptor decreased..Dexamethasone can treat asthma by inhibiting inflammatory action involving Eos infiltration, regulating the expressions of M2 and M3 receptors and restoring the function of M2 receptor.
出处 《第一军医大学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第8期986-990,共5页 Journal of First Military Medical University
关键词 地塞米松 哮喘 毒蕈碱受体 嗜酸细胞 dexamethasone asthma muscarinic receptor eosinophils
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Haddad EB, Mak JC. Muscarinic and beta-adrenergic receptor expression in peripheral lung from normal and asthmatic patients[J]. Am J Physiol, 1996, 270(6 Pt 1): L947-53.
  • 2Barnes PJ. Neural control of human airways in health and disease[J].Am Rev Respir Dis, 1986, 134(6): 1289-314.
  • 3Patel HJ, Barnes PJ. Evidence for prejunctional muscarinic autoreceptors in human and guinea pig trachea[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1995, 152(3): 872-8.
  • 4Watson N, Magnussen H, Rabe KF. Antagonism ofbeta-adrenoceptormediated relaxations of human bronchial smooth muscle by carbachol[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 1995, 275(3): 307-10.
  • 5Minette PA, Lammers JW. A muscarinic agonist inhibits reflex bronchoconstriction in normal but not in asthmatic subjects [J]. J Appl Physiol, 1989, 67(6): 2461-5.
  • 6Coulson FR, Fryer AD. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and airway diseases[J]. Pharmacol Ther, 2003, 98(1): 59-69.
  • 7Haddad EB, Mak JC. Muscarinic and beta-adrenergic receptor expression in peripheral lung from normal and asthmatic patients [J].Am J Physiol, 1996, 270(6 Pt 1): L947-53.
  • 8Gleich GJ. Mechanisms of eosinophil-associated inflammation [J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2000, 105: 651-63.
  • 9Costello, Richard W. Localization of eosinophils to airway nerves and effect on neuronal M2 muscarinic receptor function [J]. Am J Physiol, 1997, 273(Lung Cell Mol Physiol 17): L93-L103.
  • 10Bousquet J, Chanez P. Eosinophilic in flammation in asthma [J]. N Engl J Med, 1990, 323: 1033-9.

同被引文献14

  • 1罗银河,王孟清.中医药治疗小儿支气管哮喘的研究进展[J].湖南中医学院学报,2005,25(6):62-64. 被引量:5
  • 2王孟清,罗银河,陈锡军,朱晔,刘克丽,莫非钧,舒兰.咳喘宁治疗病毒诱发小儿哮喘及对患儿Th亚群的调节作用[J].中医儿科杂志,2007,3(2):28-30. 被引量:4
  • 3王孟清,罗银河,陈锡军,朱晔,刘克丽,莫非钧,舒兰.咳喘宁治疗病毒诱发小儿哮喘的临床研究[J].新中医,2007,39(4):16-17. 被引量:17
  • 4[4]Kinglham PJ,Coetello RW,McLean WG.Eosinophll and air way-nerveinteractions[J].Pulm Pharmacol Ther,2003,16(1):9-13.
  • 5Gleich G. Mechanisms of eosinophil-associated inflammation [J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2000, 105(4): 651-63.
  • 6Yost B, Gleich G, Fryer A. Ozone-induced hyperresponsiveness and blockade of M2 muscarinic receptors by eosinophil major basic protein[J]. J Appl Physiol, 1999, 87(4): 1272-8.
  • 7Kleine T, Gleich G, Lewis S. Eosinophil major basic protein increases membrane permeability in mammalian urinary bladder epithelium[J]. Am J Physiol, 1998, 275(1 Pt 1): C93-C103.
  • 8Shahana S, KampfC, Roomans G. Effects of the cationic protein poly-L-arginine on airway epitheliar cells in vitro [J]. Mediators Inflamm, 2002, 11(3): 141-8.
  • 9Page S, Gleich G, Roebuck K, et al. Stimulation ofneutrophil interleukin-8 production by eosinophil granule major basic protein[J]. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 1999, 21(2): 230-7
  • 10Matsumoto K, Saito H. The role of eosinophils in asthma: Sarastro or the Queen of Night[J]? Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 2001, 125(4):240-6.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部