期刊文献+

淡水沉积物环境质量基准差异分析 被引量:29

The Difference and Cause Analyses of Freshwater Sediment Quality Guidelines
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对现有淡水沉积物环境质量基准进行了分类比较,通过对各种基准不同污染物的基准低值、基准高值以及灰色区域的对比分析,探讨现有基准间存在的差异以及造成差异的原因.结果表明,现有各基准低值和高值问分别存在2倍到15倍,4倍到29倍的较大差异,各基准均存在较大的灰色区域.造成差异的原因主要是影响污染物生物有效性因素的复杂性,以及基准建立方法的不确定性等. Different kinds of freshwater sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) have been developed using a variety of approaches. Comparisons of lower SQGs values, upper SQGs values and the gray zones of different contaminants have been made to find and evaluate the differences among various published SQGs. The results have shown that obvious quantitative differences varied from 2 to 15 times and 4 to 29 times respectively among those lower SQGs values and upper SQGs values, and all SQGs have wide gray zones which heavily influence their applicability, The differences mainly due to the complexity of controlling factors associated with the bioavailability of various contaminants,and the uncertainties of SQGs deriving approaches.
出处 《湖泊科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第3期193-201,共9页 Journal of Lake Sciences
基金 中国科学院土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点项目(5022505)国家自然科学基金项目(40471128)联合资助.
关键词 淡水沉积物 环境质量 基准差异 生物效应 质量基准 沉积物环境 差异分析 淡水 生物有效性 分类比较 Freshwater sediment environmental quality the difference of SQGs biological effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1US EPA ( United States Environmental Protection Agency). The incidence and severity of sediment contamination in surface waters of the United States. Vol. 1: National sediment quality survey. Office of Science and Technology, Washington DC,2004, EPA -823 -R-04 -007, 3.1 -3.60.
  • 2Canfield T J, Dwyer F J, Fairchild J F, et al. Assessing contamination in Great Lakes sediments using benthic invertebrate communities and the sediment quality triad approach. J Great Lakes Res, 1996, 22:565 -583.
  • 3Swartz R C, Cole F A, Lamberson J O, et al. Sediment toxicity, contamination and amphipod abundance at a DDT- and dieldrin-contaminated site in San Francisco Bay. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1994, 13:949 -962.
  • 4Burton GA. Assessing freshwater sediment toxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1991, 10:1585 - 1627.
  • 5McCarty J P, Secord AL. Reproductive ecology of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) with high levels of polychlorinated bipheny contamination. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1999, 18:1433 - 1439.
  • 6Ludwig J P, Auman H J, Kurita H, et al. Caspian tern reproduction in the Saginaw bay ecosystem following a 100-year flood event. J Great Lakes Res, 1993: 96 - 108.
  • 7US EPA. A Guidance Manual to Support the Assessment of Contaminated Sediments in Freshwater Ecosystem Great Lakes National Program Office. Chicago, Illinois. 2002, EPA -905 - 702 -001 - B.
  • 8Burton G A. Sediment quality criteria in use around the world. The Japanese Journal of Limnology, 2002, (3) :65 -75.
  • 9US EPA, An overview of sediment quality in the United States. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington DC,and EPA Region 5, Chicago, 1987, EPA -905 -88 -002.
  • 10Chapman P M, Wang F, Adams W J, et al. Appropriate applications of sediment quality values for metals and metalloids.Environ Sci Tech, 1999, 33(22) :3937 -3941.

同被引文献485

引证文献29

二级引证文献232

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部