期刊文献+

西地那非对慢性非细菌性前列腺炎合并勃起功能障碍的作用 被引量:7

The effect of sildenafil in the treatment of chronic non-bacteria prostatitis a nd concomitant erectile dysfunction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察西地那非在治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎(CNP)合并勃起功能障碍(ED)时的作用。方法CNP合并ED患者52例,随机分为西地那非组(A组)和对照组(B组)。A组34例,NIH-CPSI评分27.4±9.5,IIEF-5评分10.7±2.8,用α1-受体阻断剂及消炎痛栓治疗4周后加用西地那非治疗6周。B组18例,NIH-CPSI评分27.3±9.6,IIEF-5评分10.9±2.7,持续使用α1-受体阻断剂及消炎痛栓治疗10周。治疗4、10周末行NIH-CPSI和IIEF-5评分并观察疗效。结果4周末,A、B组NIH-CPSI评分分别为13.2±4.7、12.5±4.5,较治疗前均显著下降(P<0.01),2组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A、B组IIEF-5评分分别为14.1±4.3、14.8±4.6,较治疗前均显著上升(P<0.01),2组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。NIH-CPSI评分改变值与自身IIEF-5评分改变值无明显相关性。10周末,A组NIH-CPSI评分9.4±3.6,IIEF-5评分19.1±4.0,与4周末比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);B组NIH-CPSI评分12.9±5.1,IIEF-5评分14.8±5.0,与4周末比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组间NIH-CPSI与IIEF-5评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。A组IIEF-5评分改变值与NIH-CPSI评分改变值呈负相关(r=-0.95,P=0.00)。结论对CNP合并ED患者,西地那非在有效治疗ED的同时,还能降低NIH-CPSI评分,促使CNP恢复。 Objective To evaluate the effect of sildenafil in the treatment of chronic non-bacteria prostatitis (CNP) with erectile dysfunction (ED). Methods Fifty-two cases diagnosed to have CNP with ED were randomized into sildenafil group (group A, n=34) and control group (group B, n=18). In group A, NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) score was 27.4±9.5 and international index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score was 10.7±2.8; antagonist of α1-adrenoceptors and indomethacin suppository were used for 4 weeks, then sildenafil was added for 6 weeks. In group B, NIH-CPSI score was 27.3±9.6 and IIEF-5 score was 10.9±2.7; antagonist of α1-adrenoceptors and indomethacin suppository were used for 10 weeks. All the cases were evaluated with IIEF-5 and NIH-CPSI at 4 weeks and 10 weeks, respectively, after treatment. Results At the end of the 4th week, NIH-CPSI score was 13.2±4.7 in group A and 12.5±4.5 in group B, which were significantly decreased compared with pre-treatment in both groups (P〈0.01 for both); but there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P〉0.05). IIEF-5 score was 14.1±4.3 in group A and 14.8±4.6 in group B, which were significantly increased compared with pre-treatment in both groups (P〈0.01 for both); but there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P〉0.05). The change of scores of NIH-CPSI was not correlated with that of IIEF-5. At the end of 10th week, NIH-CPSI score was 9.4±3.6 and IIEF-5 score was 19.1±4.0 in group A, which were significantly different from those at the end of 4th week (P〈0.01 for both). NIH-CPSI score was 12.9±5.1 and IIEF-5 score was 14.8±5.0 in group B, which were not significantly different from those at the end of 4th week (P〉0.05 for both). There were significant differences of NIH-CPSI and IIEF-5 scores between the 2 groups (P〈0.01 for both). The change of NIH-CPSI score was negatively correlated with that of IIEF-5 in group A (r=-0.95, P〈0.01). Conclusions For patients with CNP with ED, sildenafil can effectively improve erectile function as well as decrease the NIH-CPSI score, thus in favor of covering from CNP.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第9期626-628,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 阳萎 慢性非细菌性前列腺炎 西地那非 NIH-CPSI IIEF-5 勃起功能障碍 α1-受体阻断剂 评分比较 ED患者 消炎痛栓 Impotence Chronic nonbacteria prostatitis Sildenafil NIH-CPSI IIEF-5
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献16

  • 1Litwin SM,McNaughton-Collins M,Fowler FJ,et al.The NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index(NIH-CPSI):Development and validation of a new outcomes measure [ J ].J Urol,1999,162(4):369-375.
  • 2Liang CZ,Zhang XJ,Hao ZY,et al.Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in Chinese men with chronic prostatitis [ J].BJU Int,2004,93(4):568-570.
  • 3Uckert S,Kuthe A,Jonas U,et al.Characterization and functional relevance of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isoenzymes of the human protate[J].J Urol,2001,166(6):2484-2490.
  • 4Rosen RC,Riley A,Wagner G,et al.The International Index of Erectile Function(IIEF):a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction [ J ].Urology,1997,49(6):822-830.
  • 5[1]Barbalias GA, Nikiforidis G, Liatsikos EN. α-Blockers for the treatment of chronic prostatitis in combination with antibiotics[J]. J Urol, 1998,159(3):883~887.
  • 6[2]Nickel JC, Nyberg LM, Hennenfent M. Research guidelines for chronic prostatitis: consensus report from the first National Institutes of Health International Prostatitis Collaborative Network [J]. Urology,1999,54(2):229~233.
  • 7[3]Nickel JC.Effective office management of chronic prostatitis [J].Urol Clin North Am, 1998,25(4):667~684.
  • 8[4]Litwin MS, McNaughton Collins M, Fowler FJ Jr, et al. The national institutes of health chronic prostatitis symptom index: development and validation of a new outcome measure chronic prostatitis collaborative research network[J]. J Urol, 1999,162(2):369~ 375.
  • 9[5]Theodorou C, Konidaris D, Moutzouris G, et al. The urodynamic profile of prostatodynia [J]. BJU Int, 1999,84(4):461~463.
  • 10[6]Barbalias GA. Clinical and theraputical guidelines for chronic prostatitis [J]. Eur Urol,2000,37(1):116~117.

共引文献257

同被引文献106

引证文献7

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部