期刊文献+

EMBASE.com的检索特色 被引量:5

Retrieval Features of EMBASE. com
原文传递
导出
摘要 从收录范围、检索途径、标引深度和循证医学资料收集等方面,对EMBASE.com 4.0(荷兰《医学文摘》Web版)和PubMed进行对比分析。指出EMBASE.com 4.0对于检索药学和神经精神卫生文献具有一定优势,是医药学证据来源的必备检索工具。 This paper makes a comparison of EMBASE. com 4.0 and PubMed from their embodiment, index ways, etc. It shows that the EMBASE. com 4.0 is a good index book, especially for psychiatry and pharmacology.
作者 周晓政
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第9期136-139,共4页 Library and Information Service
关键词 荷兰《医学文摘》Web版 检索特色 证据检索 EMBASE. com evidence search
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1林佩蓉.荷兰《医学文摘》光盘与美国医学光盘对比[J].医学图书馆通讯,1997,6(1):46-46. 被引量:3
  • 2于双成,逢大欣,李占兵.MEDLARS与EMBASE所用词表的比较研究[J].情报理论与实践,1996,19(2):38-40. 被引量:4
  • 3.[EB].Http ://www. embase. com,[2004-11-20].
  • 4EMBASE. com Launched. Advanced Technology Libraries,2000;29(1):7.
  • 5Woods D, Trewheellar, K. Letters - Medline and Embase complement each other in literature searches. British Medical Journal,1998,316(7138) : 1166.
  • 6Leigh - Ann T et al. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the medline and embase databases. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1999,15 ( 2 ) : 297 - 303.
  • 7Watson R. Identifying randomized controlled trials of cognitive therapy for depression: Comparing the efficiency of Embase, Medline and PsycINFO bibliographic databases. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1999,72 (4) : 535 - 542.
  • 8Mcdonald S et al. Searching the right database : A comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals. Health Libraries Review, 1999, 16(3) :151 -156.
  • 9Maria E et al. Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases : MEDLINE alone is not enough. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2000,21 (5) :476 - 487.
  • 10.[EB/OL].http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/entrez/query.fcgi db =PubMeditool =toolbar,[2004-11-20].

二级参考文献1

共引文献5

同被引文献19

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部