《大学英语课程教学要求》的人文优势被引量：23

An Analysis of the Humane Connotationin the College English Curriculum Teaching Requirement

下载PDF

导出

摘要教育部2004年初公布的<大学英语课程教学要求>(试行),对大学英语的教学性质和目的、教学要求、课程设置、教学模式、教学评估和教学管理等6大方面做出的说明和部署充分体现了"以人为本,全面协调可持续的发展观",凸现了以学生为主体的当代大学英语教学原则.本文拟将<大学英语课程教学要求>与<大学英语教学大纲>作比较,通过实例分析,探究前者的人文性优势与可拓展性,以期在教学实践中更好地贯彻<课程要求>内含的人文精神. The College English Curriculum Teaching Requirement issued by China＇ s Ministry of Education explains the property of College English, sets up goal and requirements for College English curriculum, teaching-models, evaluation and management. It incarnates humanism and well represents the student-centred didactical principle. In the hope of better carrying out the Requirement and displaying its humane connotation, the article is to explore the advantages of the College English Curriculum Teaching Requirement in the aspect of humanism and its development potential by comparing it with the College English Teaching Outline through a case study.

作者陆建平

机构地区浙江大学外语传媒研究所浙江杭州

出处《外语与外语教学》北大核心 2005年第10期26-28,39,共4页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

关键词《大学英语课程教学要求》《大学英语教学大纲》人文内涵比较 the College English Curriculum Teaching Requirement, the College English Teaching Outline, humane connotation,comparison

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献7

1Daisaku Ikeda. SOKA Education[ M]. Middleway Press,2001.
2Nunan, D. Designing and Adapting Materials to Encourage Learner Autonomy. In P. Benson and P. Voller ( eds. ) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning[ M ]. London: Longman, 1997.
3张中载.外语教育中的功用主义和人文主义[J].外语教学与研究,2003,35(6):453-457. 被引量：168
4.大学英语课程教学要求(试行)[Z].北京:高等教育出版社,2004年1月..
5.大学英语教学大纲[Z].上海:上海外语教育出版社,1985..
6浙江大学.浙江大学学生守则(内部资料)[Z].浙江大学,2003—2004..
7印辉.在大学英语课堂教学中培养学生的学习自主[J].外语与外语教学,2004(9):33-36. 被引量：149

二级参考文献21

1(1)Little, D. Learning as Dialogue: The Dependence of Learner Autonomy on Teacher Autonomy[J]. System, 1995. 23 (2): 175- 182.
2(2) Little, D. Responding Authentically to Authentic Texts: A Problem for Self-access Language Learning. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds).Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning[ M]. London: Longman, 1997:225 - 236.
3Macaro, E. Target Language, Collaborative Learning and Autonomy [M]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1997.
4McGarry, D. Learner Autonomy 4: The Role of Authentic Texts[M].Dublin: Authentik, 1995.
5Nunan, D. Designing and Adapting Materials to Encourage Learner Autonomy. In P. Benson and P. Voller ( eds. ). Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning[M]. London: Longnan, 1997:192- 203.
6Perkins, L. and Salomon, G. Are Cognitive Skills Context-bound? Educational Researcher, 1989( 1 ): 16 - 25.
7Sheerin, S. An Exploration of the Relationship between Self-access and Independent Learning. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds.). Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning[M]. London: Longman, 1997:54 - 65.
8Victori, M. and Lockhart, W. Enhancing Metacoguition in Self-directed Language Learning[J]. System, 1995. 23 (2): 223- 234.
9Volet, S.E. Modeling and Coaching of Relevant Metacoguitive Strategies for Enhancing University Students' Learning. Learning and Instruction, 1991.1 (4): 319 - 336.
10Weiner, F.E. and Kluwe, R. H. (ods.). Metacognition , Motivation and Understanding[M]. London: Lawrence Erbaum Associates, 1987.