摘要
本文回顾了亚里士多德等人对芝诺悖论的一些看法,指出寻找该悖论推理过程逻辑漏洞的必要性,并试图给出对追龟辩和飞矢辩不同于亚里士多德、罗素等人的分析。
This paper has reviewed Aristotle and others＇ consideration of Zeno＇s Paradoxes, and demonstrated that it is necessary to trace the falsehoods during the process of reasoning of Zeno＇s Paradoxes, and tried to give different analysis to Zeno＇s Second Paradox （Achilles） and Third Paradox from Aristotle and H. N. Russell etc.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第11期1-4,42,共5页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词
芝诺悖论
诡辩
逻辑学
亚里士多德
罗素
Zeno＇s paradoxes
logical falsehood
Aristotle
H. N. Russell
