摘要
纸面表述的历史与实际存在的历史之间的相互脱节,导致了"真实历史"与"虚构历史"之间的纠缠不清,即使在被誉为第一手材料的司法档案中,也存在不少"虚构"的成份。本文以明末徽州诉讼案卷《不平鸣稿》为素材,通过考察和分析明清时期司法档案中的"虚构"成份与司法制度之间的内在关联,冀以阐明产生"虚构"的深层原因,并考掘出镶嵌于"虚构"中的作者的"真实"动机和目的,从而说明司法档案并非一种单纯的记录,而是一种动机复杂而又充满张力的叙述。
History on the paper divorced from history in real existence, this causes “ture history” badgering with “fictive history”. Even in the so-called “first-hand material”, the judicial records, there are much “fictive” parts.Based on the judicial records BuPingMingGao at the end of Ming Dynasty, reviewing and analysing the inter-relationship between fictive parts and the judicial system in Ming and Qing Dynasty, this article explains the reasons for “fiction”, and finds out the “ture”motivation and purpose of the authors from the fictive parts. Further, it makes out that judicial records are not simple records, but a kind of discription with complex motivation and full of tension.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第5期42-49,共8页
The Jurist
