摘要
近几年讨论的“中国哲学合法性问题”,实际上就是中国哲学史学科的独立性问题,也就是金岳霖提出的中国哲学史是“中国哲学的史”还是“在中国的哲学史”的问题。“金岳霖问题”揭示了中国哲学内含的现代性与民族性的矛盾。这一矛盾在胡适(“疑古”)、冯友兰(“释古”)建构中国哲学史学科的实践中得到鲜明的反映,并在张岱年的“文化创造主义”中获得积极的回应。
The problem of “legitimacy of Chinese philosophy” discussed in recent years is in fact the one for a disciplinary independence of the history of Chinese philosophy. It is also the one put forward by Jin Yuelin that whether the history of Chinese philosophy is “a history of Chinese philosophy”or “a history of philosophy in China”. “Jin Yuelin＇s Question” reveals a contradiction between modernity and nationality in Chinese philosophy. This contradiction was obviously seen in Hu Shi （“doubt in the ancient”） and Feng Youlan （“interpretation to the ancient”） in their practice in constructing the discipline of the history of Chinese philosophy, and had a positive response in Zhang Dainian＇s “cultural creationism”.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第11期12-20,共9页
Academic Monthly
基金
上海重点学科建设项目资助
关键词
中国哲学史
学科独立性
现代性
民族性
history of Chinese philosophy, disciplinary independence, modernity, nationality
