期刊文献+

论对间接言语行为的转喻解释 被引量:3

On the Metonymic Interpretation of Indirect Speech Acts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为一个重要的语言现象,间接言语行为引起了语言学家的普遍关注,但传统的理论研究却没能对其做一个令人满意的解释。最近,Thornburg和Panther从认知角度对间接言语行为进行研究并提出了转喻解释理论,从而揭示了间接言语行为的转喻本质。但此理论忽视了对一些必要的语用参数的考虑,从而无法对间接言语行为作全面的解释。因此需要对此转喻解释做进一步的改进。 As an important language phenomenon, indirect speech act has attracted a great deal of attention. Traditional theoretic study fails to provide a satisfactory interpretation of indirect speech act. More recently, Thornburg and Panther study this language phenomenon from the perspective of cognition and propose their metonymic interpreting theory which reveals the metonymic nature of indirect speech acts. However, this theory fails to take some indispensable pragmatic parameters into consideration, so it is not capable of providing a full interpretation. The theory needs to be improved.
作者 马瑞贤
出处 《衡水学院学报》 2005年第4期45-47,共3页 Journal of Hengshui University
关键词 间接言语行为 转喻 场境 语用参数 indirect speech acts metonymy scenario pragmatic parameters
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1范家材. 英语修辞赏析[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 1997.
  • 2Bach, K. & R. Harnish. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1979.
  • 3Gibbs, Raymond W., The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge university Press, 1994.
  • 4Gordon, David & George Lakoff. Conversational Postulates [A]. In Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds). Speech Acts(Syntax and Semantics 3)[C]. New York: Academic Press,187-210.
  • 5Hernandez,L.P. & F.J.R. de Mendoza. Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (2002):259-284.
  • 6Lakoff,George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 7Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Metaphor We Live by[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 8Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics[M]. New York: Longman, 1983.
  • 9Levinson, Stephen. Pragmatics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 10Morgan, Jerry L. Two types of convention in indirect speech acts[A]. In Peter Cole (ed), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9: Pragmatics[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1978:261-280.

共引文献30

同被引文献40

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部