期刊文献+

老年直肠癌患者腹腔镜根治术与开腹根治术比较 被引量:13

A Comparison of Laparoscopic and Laparotomy Radical Surgery for Elderly Patients with Rectal Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨应用腹腔镜技术治疗老年直肠癌患者的可行性和近期临床疗效。[方法]比较2004年1月至2005年4月,20例行腹腔镜手术的老年直肠癌患者(A组),与30例行开腹根治术的老年直肠癌患者(B组)围手术期的临床资料。[结果]两组术中失血量(A<B)、手术后胃肠功能和排尿功能恢复时间及住院时间(A<B),手术时间和住院费用(A>B)均有显著差异(P<0.05)。两组清扫淋巴结数量无差异(P>0.05)。[结论]腹腔镜根治术和开腹根治术治疗老年直肠癌患者在技术上同样安全可靠。腹腔镜技术更具有创伤小、围手术期出血少、手术后恢复快等突出优点,因而对于老年直肠癌患者可能有更好的应用前景。 [Purpose] To investigate the feasibility and short term effects of laparoscopic radical surgery for elderly rectal cancer patient. [Methods ]Periopcrative clinical data of radical resections were compared between 20 cases undergoing laparotomy radical resection (group A) and 30 cases undergoing open radical resection (group B) from Jan. 2004 to Apr. 2005. [Results ]There were significant difference in intra-operatlve blood loss (group A〈B), the post-operative recovery time of gastrointestinal and urinary function (group A〈B), the mean operation time (group A〉B),and the hospitalization cost (group A〉B) between the two groups.There was no significant difference in numbers of resected lymph nodes between the two groups. [Conclusion]Both laparoscopic and laparotomy surgery are feasible and safty for elderly rectal carcinoma patients. Laparoscopic surgery, with minimal invasive,lesser perioperative blood loss, rapid postoperative recovery might have good application foreground.
出处 《肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2005年第6期405-407,共3页 Journal of Chinese Oncology
关键词 腹腔镜检查 直肠肿瘤 老年天 laparoscopy rectal neoplasms aged
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献10

  • 1Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira R, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg, 1997,132: 41-44.
  • 2Lumley J, Stitz R, Stevenson A, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate to long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45:867-875.
  • 3Lujan HJ, Plasencia G, Jacobs M, et al. Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45:491-501.
  • 4Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy- assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 2002,359:2224-2229.
  • 5Jacobs M, Werdeja JC, Goldstein HS, et al. Minimally invasive colon-resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1:144-150.
  • 6Kok KY, Ngoi SS. Laparoscopic colon resection: current status. Asian J Surg, 1998,21:37-42.
  • 7Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lau WY, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted abdomino-perineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc,2000,14:67-70.
  • 8Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, et al. Indication for using high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery: examination of nodal metastases by the clearing method. Dis Colon Rectum,1998,41:984-991.
  • 9Killingback M, Barron P, Dent OF. Local recurrent after curative resection of cancer of the rectum without total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001,44:473-486.
  • 10郁宝铭.直肠癌见:王吉普主编.胃肠外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.1118.

共引文献103

同被引文献41

引证文献13

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部