摘要
最高人民法院以司法解释形式确立非法证据排除原则,缺乏法律依据,有悖程序法定原则与法律至上的理念,其合法性值得质疑。同时,鉴定结论作为言词证据的一种,也应当成为非法证据排除原则适用的对象,最高人民法院确立的非法证据排除原则未将鉴定结论包括在内,其合理性值得质疑。建议全国人民代表大会以立法的形式确立非法证据排除原则。
The Superb Court establishing the principle to rule out illegal testimony through judicial explanation is against the principle of proceduer litigation and the idea that law is the highest authority in the world, so its litigation is doubtful. Besides, as a kind of verbal testimony, appraisal conclusion should also be the object for principle to rule out illegal testimony to adjust. The principle to rule out illegal testimony established by the Superb Court excludes appraisal conclusion, so its reasonableness also is doubtful. We consider that the highest authority system in China should establish a law to execute the principle to rule out illegal testimony.
出处
《长沙航空职业技术学院学报》
2005年第4期80-84,共5页
Journal of Changsha Aeronautical Vocational and Technical College
关键词
非法证据
国际法
程序法定
illegal testimony
international law
proceduer litigation
