期刊文献+

地理标识的延伸保护探析 被引量:5

Probe on the Protection of Geography Trade Mark's Extension Rights
原文传递
导出
摘要 地理标识是具有系列不同保护概念的一种知识产权。与WIPO管理下的有关协定相比,WTO/TRIPs协定对地理标识的保护具有一定的历史进步性,但仍存在一定的缺陷。除葡萄酒和烈酒外,其他产品的地理标识容易被误用。延伸保护是WTO多哈回合重要议题之一,"新""旧"两个世界围绕这个问题在继续争论。延伸保护将鼓励更高质量的产品走向世界市场,这不仅有益于各国合法的生产者和制造者,且有益于消费者。 Geographical indications (GIs) are intellectual property rights which have series of different concepts. Comparing other Agreements under the WIPO, the TRIPs Agreement represents a considerable improvement in the international protection of GIs, yet it has some defects. Except for wines and Spirits, it is all too easy to misuse GIs. The extension is an important issue in the Doha Round and continues to be debated between “old world” and “new world”. The extension shall encourage more quality products to be put on the world's market. This is not only in the interests of legitimate producers and manufacturers in all countries, but in consumers' interests.
作者 赵小平
机构地区 山西大学法学院
出处 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第6期97-103,共7页 The Jurist
关键词 地理标识 额外保护 延伸 TRIPS协定 geographical indications the additional protection extension TRIPs Agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1R. Silva Repetto and M. Cavalcanti, Muhilateral Trade Negotiations on Agriculture: A Resource Manual, IV, TRIPS Agreement, Module 3: Provisions of the TRIPS Agreement Relevant to Agriculture (Part One), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome, 2000, Chapter 3.4.1.
  • 2Michael Blakeney, Proposals for the International Regulation of Geographical Indications. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, September 2001, p.635.
  • 3Swiss Federal Court, 2 August 1994, Alaska, P.M.M.B.I. 1994. p.76.
  • 4.《保护工业产权巴黎公约》第10.3条[Z].,..
  • 5WIPO国际局 杨一平译.地理标识现有保护途径及存在的问题[J].商标通讯,2001,(7):29-29.
  • 6Panel Report on EC protection of Gls, paras. 7.758, 7.767, 8.1 (m) .
  • 7赵小平.TRIPs协定对地理标识的法律保护[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,27(5):85-88. 被引量:6
  • 8Rajesh Acharya. Food Fight: Rice Tec & Basmati Rice Patents. www.cafezine.com/index.
  • 9See WIPO Doe. SCT/5/3 of 8 June 2000, para.44.http://www.wipo.int.
  • 10IP/C/W/204/Rev. 1 of 2 Oct. 2000.

二级参考文献2

  • 1[3]WIPO, What is the difference between geographical indications and trademark [ Z/OL]. http:∥www. wipo. int/about- ip/en/about-geographical-ind. html# P34 _ 3188,2003 -12 - 08.
  • 2[7]Spain, Argentina dispute ' Rioja' [ Z/OL]. http:∥www.findarticles. com/cf-dls/m3488/2-83/83262833/p1/article.jhtml; 或 Additional Protection for GI for Wines and Spirits, www. southcentre. org/publications/geoindications.htm,2004 - 01 - 12.

共引文献5

同被引文献22

  • 1刘亚军.完善我国地理标志法律保护实证分析[J].当代法学,2004,18(2):46-52. 被引量:36
  • 2李永明.论原产地名称的法律保护[J].中国法学,1994(3):65-72. 被引量:27
  • 3王莲峰,黄泽雁.地理标志保护模式之争与我国的立法选择[J].华东政法学院学报,2006(6):44-53. 被引量:45
  • 4[5]原琪.国际公约对地理标志的保护[N].中国工商报,2001-09-20
  • 5李华 王照料.地理标志与商标的本质区别[J].贵州师范大学学报,2005,(1).
  • 6David R. Downes and Sarah A. Laird. Innovative Mechanisms for Sharing Benefits of Biodiversity and Related Knowledge: Case Studies on Geographical Indications and Trademarks[R/OL]. paper prepared for the UNCTAD Biotrade Initiative, 1999. http://www.ciel.org/publications/Innovative Mechanisms,2001 - 06 - 12.
  • 7Trade Policy Review Body- Trade Policy Review- Mexico Report by the Secretariat[Z]. WT/TPR/S/97,2002 - 03 - 15.
  • 8农业贸易促进中心.农业谈判率先启动香港会议后多哈发展议程[OL].http://www.carte.gov.cn,2006—04—02.
  • 9农业实际情况使中国不能再做减让—访中国农业部副部长牛盾[OL].http.//www.carte.gov.cn.2006—03—20.
  • 10“后过渡期”的中国农业[OL].http://www.wtoinfo.net.cn.2006—04—02.

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部